Re: [PATCH] board-overo.c: enable TWL4030 power off

[Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>]

Hello Andreas,

On 03/05/2013 09:15 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>> * Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> [130228 04:50]:
>>
>> Can you please add a description here? Preferrably something
>> like "With commit XYZ overo poweroff stopped working. Fix this
>> by blah blah blah" so this can be queued as a fix.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c |    5 +++++
>>>   1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c
>>> index 86bab51..b975c72 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c
>>> @@ -418,9 +418,14 @@ static struct regulator_init_data overo_vmmc1 = {
>>>        .consumer_supplies      = overo_vmmc1_supply,
>>>   };
>>>
>>> +static struct twl4030_power_data overo_power_data = {
>>> +     .use_poweroff   = true,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>   static struct twl4030_platform_data overo_twldata = {
>>>        .gpio           = &overo_gpio_data,
>>>        .vmmc1          = &overo_vmmc1,
>>> +     .power          = &overo_power_data,
>>>   };
>>>
>>>   static int __init overo_i2c_init(void)
>>> --
> Sorry for the noise but I am newbie here and have one question:
> Against which branch should patches send here be based on. Up to now I
> used Linus' mainline branch - is that OK?
>

Any plans to repost your patch?

Regards,

Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html