From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: OMAP5: Add palmas MFD node and regulator nodes Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:01:43 -0600 Message-ID: <51B749E7.6070808@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1370928651-6278-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1370928651-6278-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: J Keerthy Cc: swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, gg-kDsPt+C1G03kYMGBc/C6ZA@public.gmane.org, linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 06/10/2013 11:30 PM, J Keerthy wrote: > This patch adds Palmas MFD node and the regulator nodes for OMAP5. > > The node definitions are based on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/6/25 > > Boot tested on omap5-uevm board. > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts > + palmas: palmas@48 { > + reg = <0x48>; > + interrupts = ; /* IRQ_SYS_1N */ > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>; > + }; > +}; > + > +&palmas { > + compatible = "ti,palmas"; > + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; I don't really see the point of splitting the node into two parts if it's all going into a single file. It made sense if part of the node came from a common .dtsi file, but not so much when it doesn't.