From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleksandr Kozaruk Subject: Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:20:56 +0300 Message-ID: <51B9AB18.30801@ti.com> References: <1370602390-12306-1-git-send-email-oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com> <20130607143649.GS31367@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:48854 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751406Ab3FMLVZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:21:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Oleksandr Kozaruk Cc: gg@slimlogic.co.uk, Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, balbi@ti.com, peter.ujfalusi@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com, tony@atomide.com On 06/13/2013 11:17 AM, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:44 PM, > wrote: > > > > On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote: > >>> > >>> From: Graeme Gregory > > >>> > >>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by > >>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to > >>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in > line with > >>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion. > >>> > >>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code. > >> > >> > >> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as > >> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID > >> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might > >> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason. > > > > > > I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run! > > > > Graeme > > Hello Mark, Graeme, > > Taking in account that: > - there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible; > - there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes > to twl6032 is not known; > - twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found > on ti.com > > So, what do you think, can this change be accepted? > Sorry for spamming - had problems with mail server.