From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove unused voltagedomain data for AM33xx Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:42:17 +0530 Message-ID: <51BE9AB1.2080308@ti.com> References: <1371118124-15910-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <8738skaj16.fsf@linaro.org> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83ECB9CD9@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:53459 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754646Ab3FQFMu (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 01:12:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83ECB9CD9@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Hiremath, Vaibhav" Cc: Kevin Hilman , Paul Walmsley , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "Menon, Nishanth" On Monday 17 June 2013 10:38 AM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- >> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Hilman >> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 7:31 PM >> To: Paul Walmsley >> Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; Hiremath, Vaibhav; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove unused voltagedomain data for AM33xx >> >> Paul Walmsley writes: >> >>> cc Kevin, Vaibhav >>> >>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >>> >>>> The powerdomain framework today expects to always have a >> voltagedomain >>>> associated with a given powerdomain. We already have AM33xx which >>>> has no Voltage Controller/Voltage Processor as part of PRCM. >>>> There are more SoCs' to follow starting with AM437x and DRA7xx >>>> which do not have VC/VP. >>>> >>>> Instead of adding dummy voltage domain data files, make the >> powerdomain >>>> framework aware of the fact that some SoCs' might not really have >>>> scalable voltage domains. >>> >>> Fine with me in principle if AM335x doesn't support voltage scaling. >>> Vaibhav, if this is okay for you, please ack it. >>> >>> Then, in terms of merging, probably Kevin would be the right person >> for >>> this since he's done much of the voltagedomain work. >> >> Yeah, I'll take this series after the minor issues I commented on are >> fixed, and Vaivhav ack's the AM33xx parts. >> > > Yeup, Feel free to add my Ack here. Thanks Vaibhav, I will add your and Nishanths' ack for this series and repost a v2 addressing Kevins comments. regards, Rajendra > > > Thanks, > Vaibhav >