From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] input/ti_am33x_tsc: Order of TSC wires, made configurable Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 19:57:26 +0530 Message-ID: <51D5864E.20401@ti.com> References: <1370950268-7224-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1370950268-7224-5-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <51D5592F.6050208@ti.com> <51D55D80.6080803@linutronix.de> <51D57AF9.2020001@ti.com> <51D57DBC.3050503@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:43842 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752610Ab3GDO1p (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jul 2013 10:27:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <51D57DBC.3050503@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Lee Jones , Samuel Ortiz , =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudCBDb3Vzc29u?= , Tony Lindgren , Jonathan Cameron , Dmitry Torokhov , Felipe Balbi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org On 7/4/2013 7:20 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 07/04/2013 03:39 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> Yes, I noticed that after sending the mail. To me it does not make sense >> to make changes to accept something as platform data only to remove >> platform data itself later. > > The patches were made earlier and it was easier that way to take > everything and simple remove the platform part later. Okay, then. If the maintainers do not have objection, I am fine too! Regards, Sekhar