From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Quadros Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mfd: omap-usb-host: Put pins in IDLE state on suspend Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:23:58 +0300 Message-ID: <51E3B19E.80906@ti.com> References: <1373473081-27181-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1373473380-27515-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <51E2A603.1000805@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51E2A603.1000805@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, balbi@ti.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, tony@atomide.com, ruslan.bilovol@ti.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Samuel Ortiz List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 07/14/2013 04:22 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > On 07/10/2013 05:23 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >> In order to support wake up from suspend use the pinctrl >> framework to put the USB host pins in IDLE state during suspend. >> >> CC: Samuel Ortiz >> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros > > [...] > >> @@ -608,6 +618,14 @@ static int usbhs_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return -ENOMEM; >> } >> >> + if (!dev->pins || !dev->pins->idle_state) { >> + /* If IDLE pins are not available, we can't remote wakeup, >> + * so prevent idling in that case. >> + */ > > nit: multi-line comment style > > Also, if there are no pins, aren't the pinctrl ops nops anyways? IOW, > not sure the need > for this is clear, and it's not mentioned in the changelog. The pinctrl ops are nops but the runtime suspend isn't. So in this case, we'll never be able to wake up the USB controller. I'll update the changelog to reflect this. cheers, -roger