From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>,
balbi@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, paul@pwsan.com,
khilman@linaro.org, benoit.cousson@gmail.com, ambresh@ti.com,
sourav.poddar@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] ARM: DRA7: id: Add cpu detection support for DRA7xx based SoCs'
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:19:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F8B372.2000309@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130731064201.GQ7656@atomide.com>
On Wednesday 31 July 2013 12:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> [130730 23:09]:
>>
>> Tony, what do you suggest we do for this series? Since we have just an es1.0 and one board
>> at this point for dra7xx, things would be fine even if we do a dt based parsing to identify
>> the device, and I am fine with it if thats what we feel is the right way forward.
>> For the rest of the DT only platforms (omap4/5/am335x) anyway getting rid of these rev checks
>> from the kernel and depending on DT parsing needs to be a separate series anyway and I dont
>> plan to address those as part of this series.
>
> Well I'd say there's no need to drop the hardware revision checks
> at this point at least for existing hardware. That's a very minimal
> piece of code and there are way bigger issues to tackle.
right, makes sense.
>
> For new SoCs, we could do it based on the compatible flag. If it
> helps booting newer hardware with older kernels, then that's a good
> reason to do it.
Sure, we can have dra7xx use the compatible flag and not add all the rev checks.
That said, I would be glad if the latest kernels at least boot on newer hardware
let alone older kernels :) But I guess we have bigger issues to tackle before
even that happens. Thanks for the quick response.
regards,
Rajendra
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-31 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-30 11:25 [PATCH v2 0/8] DRA7xx core support Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ARM: DRA7: id: Add cpu detection support for DRA7xx based SoCs' Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 13:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-30 13:18 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-30 13:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-30 14:18 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-30 14:23 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-30 14:36 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-30 15:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-30 18:37 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-30 18:43 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-31 6:02 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-31 6:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-31 6:49 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2013-07-30 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ARM: DRA7: hwmod: Reuse the soc_ops used for OMAP4/5 Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ARM: DRA7: Reuse all of PRCM and MPUSS SMP infra Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 12:26 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-30 12:38 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 12:41 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-30 12:48 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 12:57 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-30 12:59 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ARM: DRA7: Reuse io tables and add a new .init_early Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ARM: DRA7: Resue the clocksource, clockevent support Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] ARM: DRA7: board-generic: Add basic DT support Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ARM: DRA7: Kconfig: Make ARCH_NR_GPIO default to 512 Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ARM: DRA7: dts: Add the dts files for dra7 SoC and dra7-evm board Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 12:30 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-30 12:41 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 12:46 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-30 12:56 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-07-30 12:59 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-30 13:01 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-12 13:46 ` Benoit Cousson
2013-08-12 11:44 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-13 7:24 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-13 9:46 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-13 10:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-08-14 9:40 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-02 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] DRA7xx core support Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-04 16:14 ` Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F8B372.2000309@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=ambresh@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=benoit.cousson@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=r.sricharan@ti.com \
--cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).