From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Add new bindings for OMAP Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:14:55 +0530 Message-ID: <5214B647.8040408@ti.com> References: <1376983966-16490-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1376983966-16490-3-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <20130821074514.GU7656@atomide.com> <52147E95.5000606@ti.com> <20130821085330.GH7656@atomide.com> <521486E1.6030009@ti.com> <20130821122327.GI7656@atomide.com> <5214B50D.3050703@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5214B50D.3050703@ti.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > > So, If I understand this right we would have the dt entries > something like, > > omap4.dtsi > ------ > ocp { > reg = <...>; > interrupts = <...>; > ti,no-reset-on-init = <&emif1, &emif2, &gpmc>; > ... > }; > > omap4-panda-es.dts > ------ > ocp { This would actually be &ocp { > ti,no-reset-on-init = <&emif1, &emif2, &gpmc, &gpio4>; > ... > }; > > Is it that, or you suggesting we can _append_ the soc list of > modules with board specific modules, which I am not sure if its > possible. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >