public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Richard Zhao <rizhao@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, vinod.koul@intel.com,
	djbw@fb.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] DMA: add help function to check whether dma controller registered
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:36:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52167665.90602@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377153781-18006-1-git-send-email-rizhao@nvidia.com>

On 08/22/2013 12:43 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> DMA client device driver usually needs to know at probe time whether
> dma controller has been registered to deffer probe. So add a help
> function of_dma_check_controller.
> 
> DMA request channel functions can also used to check it, but they
> are usually called at open() time.

This new function is almost identical to the existing
of_dma_request_slave_channel(). Surely the code should be shared?

But that said, I don't see any need for a new function; why can't
drivers simply call of_dma_request_slave_channel() at probe time; from
what I can see, that function doesn't actually request the channel, but
rather simply looks it up, just like this one. The only difference is
that of_dma_xlate() is also called, but that's just doing some data
transformation, not actually recording channel ownership.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-22 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1375423458-6868-1-git-send-email-rizhao@nvidia.com>
2013-08-22  6:43 ` [PATCH v2] DMA: add help function to check whether dma controller registered Richard Zhao
2013-08-22 20:36   ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-08-23  1:17     ` Richard Zhao
2013-08-23 15:56       ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52167665.90602@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=djbw@fb.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rizhao@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox