From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Holler Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: interrupt consistency check for OF GPIO IRQs Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:28:17 +0200 Message-ID: <52319741.5050407@ahsoftware.de> References: <1375101368-17645-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <344239800.bDEkDg48ZQ@avalon> <52308C91.2000105@ahsoftware.de> <523096FE.8080901@collabora.co.uk> <5230AB6E.1070807@ahsoftware.de> <5231817F.8000901@ahsoftware.de> <5231934D.4060706@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h1446028.stratoserver.net ([85.214.92.142]:36938 "EHLO mail.ahsoftware.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751955Ab3ILK2h (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:28:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5231934D.4060706@collabora.co.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Linus Walleij , Laurent Pinchart , Grant Likely , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux-OMAP , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Santosh Shilimkar , Kevin Hilman , Balaji T K , Tony Lindgren , Jon Hunter Am 12.09.2013 12:11, schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas: > On 09/12/2013 10:55 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: ... >> >> By the way, how do you define two GPIOs/IRQs from different >> gpio-banks/irq-controllers wuth that scheme? >> > > That is indeed a very good question and I don't have a definite answer. > >> Would that be like below? >> >> ethernet@5,0 { >> compatible = "smsc,lan9221", "smsc,lan9115"; >> interrupt-parent = <&gpio6>; >> interrupts = <16 8>; >> interrupt-parent = <&gpio7>; >> interrupts = <1 IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING>; /* GPIO7_1 */ >> }; >> ... > So, if I understood the code correctly the DT IRQ core doesn't expect a device > node to have more than one "interrupt-parent" property. > > It *should* work though if you have multiple "interrupts" properties defined and > all of them have the same "interrupt-parent": > > interrupt-parent = <&gpio6>; > interrupts = <1 IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH>; /* GPIO6_1 */ > interrupts = <2 IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW>; /* GPIO6_2 */ > > since of_irq_map_one() will be called for each "interrupts" and the correct > "interrupt-parent" will get obtained by of_irq_find_parent(). I assumed that answer. So to make such a scenario possible, something like this might be neccessary: interrupts = <&gpio6 1 IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH>; /* GPIO6_1 */ interrupts = <&gpio7 2 IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW>; /* GPIO7_2 */ or, to be compatible interrupts = <1 IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH &gpio6>; /* GPIO6_1 */ interrupts = <1 IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW &gpio7>; /* GPIO7_1 */ Another problem is the naming. In all the above cases, the driver would not know which IRQ he should use for what. Maybe the order defines it, but that wouldn't be very verbose. And I think just changing the name would make travelling the tree impossible, as only the driver itself would know the name and it's meaning. Regards, Alexander Holler