From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Mack Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dma: cppi41: more suspend/resume patches Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 09:23:38 +0200 Message-ID: <5255047A.5010609@gmail.com> References: <1380634271-27588-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> <20131009064124.GA3529@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:39552 "EHLO mail-wi0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752134Ab3JIHXw (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:23:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131009064124.GA3529@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, neumann@teufel.de, vinod.koul@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, balbi@ti.com On 09.10.2013 08:41, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Daniel Mack | 2013-10-01 15:31:08 [+0200]: > >> Patch #1 restores more registers on resume time. >> >> Patch #2 is a cosmetic cleanup that emerged while digging through the >> driver and gaining a basic idea of how it's implemented. Nothing fancy. > > I'm fine with those two. > >> >> Patch #3, however, gives me headaches. I can't fully explain what's >> going on, but I can tell for sure that if fixes a problem that I stared >> on for many hours. > > I'm still trying to verify if it breaks something or not. So I haven't > forgotten about this. Ok, thank you very much for the update :) I can of course test alternative patches if you have any. Could you actually reproduce the issue I described by sending your board to suspend? Daniel