From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, balbi@ti.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: omap-usb-tll: Don't hold lock during pm_runtime_get/put_sync()
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:58:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CCF027.6040607@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131218103641.GD14274@lee--X1>
Hi,
On 12/18/2013 04:06 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> pm_runtime_get/put_sync() can sleep so don't hold spinlock while
>> calling them.
>>
>> This patch prevents a BUG() when CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is enabled.
>> Bug is present in Kernel versions v3.9 onwards.
>>
>> Reported-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c
>> index 0d946ae1..248004c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c
>> @@ -346,7 +346,9 @@ int omap_tll_init(struct usbhs_omap_platform_data *pdata)
>> for (i = 0; i < tll->nch; i++)
>> needs_tll |= omap_usb_mode_needs_tll(pdata->port_mode[i]);
>>
>> + spin_unlock(&tll_lock);
>> pm_runtime_get_sync(tll_dev);
>> + spin_lock(&tll_lock);
>
> This is pretty ugly. Can't you move it above the spin_lock() instead?
OK. I'll also remove NULL check for tll_dev outside the spin_lock().
>
> <snip>
>
>> tll = dev_get_drvdata(tll_dev);
>>
>> + spin_unlock(&tll_lock);
>> pm_runtime_get_sync(tll_dev);
>> + spin_lock(&tll_lock);
>
> Same here?
Yes.
>
>> for (i = 0; i < tll->nch; i++) {
>> if (omap_usb_mode_needs_tll(pdata->port_mode[i])) {
>> @@ -438,7 +441,6 @@ int omap_tll_enable(struct usbhs_omap_platform_data *pdata)
>> }
>>
>> spin_unlock(&tll_lock);
>> -
>
> This doesn't belong in this patch and is now inconsistent with the
> other functions in the driver.
OK.
>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(omap_tll_enable);
>> @@ -464,9 +466,8 @@ int omap_tll_disable(struct usbhs_omap_platform_data *pdata)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - pm_runtime_put_sync(tll_dev);
>> -
>> spin_unlock(&tll_lock);
>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(tll_dev);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>
cheers,
-roger
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 10:01 [PATCH] mfd: omap-usb-tll: Don't hold lock during pm_runtime_get/put_sync() Roger Quadros
2013-12-18 10:36 ` Lee Jones
2014-01-08 6:28 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CCF027.6040607@ti.com \
--to=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).