From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Linaro Kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org>,
Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@linaro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
Linaro Networking <linaro-networking@linaro.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: sleep: byteswap data for big-endian
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:03:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D5A60C.7080800@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGo_u6p7ErrKOMy4Ljg3nehVpd=DOg3XDn6gZ1nrFE_OuOjsWg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 14 January 2014 03:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Victor Kamensky
> <victor.kamensky@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 14 January 2014 09:56, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Victor Kamensky
>>> <victor.kamensky@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When BE kernel is built Makefile does take of compiling code in BE
>>>> mode. I.e all proper flags like -mbig-endian and -Wl,--be8 will be set.
>>>
>>> Agreed, and I assume you cannot instead switch to LE mode when
>>> entering assembly assuming LE?
>>
>> Yes. Note that this asm interacts with other data in kernel that would
>> be in BE form. And after all linker will not allow to put together files
>> that were compiled in different endianity.
>>
>>> The reason I ask this is - most of our development is NOT in BE mode.
>>> we will continue to manipulate and add assembly - AM335x, DRA7/OMAP5
>>> etc.. and obviously not every code change will indulge in ensuring
>>> right markers will be in place.
>>>
>>> by ensuring readl_relaxed handles the variations, you have ensured
>>> that I dont need to care about drivers other than to ensure they use
>>> _relaxed variants. in the case of assembly, this does not seem long
>>> term manageable.
>>
>> Yes, I agree if it is outside of main use case it will get broken if not
>> attended to. Definitely universe entropy increases :) - if left without
>> attention things will decay. Note we admit that even with ARM CPU
>> core BE changes similar decay can happen eventually ...that is
>> what LNG BE group trying to prevent. I think
>> the deal here is that next user of it can/need to fix things if they
>> decayed.
>>
>
> Personally, I have no idea what "LNG BE" stands for.. I see the
> approach we are attempting here is to do any interaction external to
> ARM boundary to go through the ARM_BE8 macro.
>
> If we want to make this something we can live with, then the platforms
> will have to ensure memory operations external to ARM must be operated
> upon by these macros. Instead, an approach that may be used is to
> introduce accessors macros that will provide right instruction based
> on BE/LE build and BE/LE SoC peripheral behavior.
>
>>>>
>>>>> is the idea of BE build meant to deal with having a single BE kernel
>>>>> build work for all platforms (including LE ones)?
>>>>
>>>> Sort of. The idea here to run BE image on OMAP4 chip, with
>>>> kernel that would deals with LE periphery correctly, but ARM
>>>> core run in BE with special kernel that compiled for BE case (i.e
>>>> CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN is set).
>>>
>>> I still dont get the usecase - other than "hey, we do this coz we can
>>> do it!".. I mean, yep, it sounds great and all.. but 4 years down the
>>> line, is this still going to work? is this going to be interesting
>>> careabout? or we are just maintaining additional code for a passing
>>> fancy or proof-of-concept?
>>
>> Valid concern. From LNG BE group point of view it is not "we can do
>> it". It is more like we've done it. We have Pandaboard ES running BE
>> kernel for a while. It is in LNG BE tree. We used it as development
>> and testing vehicle for BE work for a while. We are very grateful to
>> the platform for that - it is affordable and easily available! Given,
>> beyond ongoing BE testing on Pandaboard in LNG there may not be valid
>> use case for further things on OMAP4 BE. We had discussion
>> with Santosh Shilimkar from TI during last Linaro connect what to
>> do with LNG BE Pandaboard series. Santosh suggested and we
>> agreed that we would try to contribute them back to community. And
>> that is what Taras is doing. IMHO even though there may not be real
>
> ok.. some sort of Linaro thing about which I have no background about
> - but dont really care in this context.
>
Nothing related Linaro. Its just that platforms are supporting ARM BE
mode and Linaro folks had working patches for Panda. So I suggested
to get them on the lists.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-13 15:03 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: sleep: byteswap data for big-endian Taras Kondratiuk
2014-01-13 15:23 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-14 11:14 ` Taras Kondratiuk
2014-01-14 15:51 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-14 17:35 ` Victor Kamensky
2014-01-14 17:56 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-14 20:20 ` Victor Kamensky
2014-01-14 20:56 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-14 21:03 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2014-01-14 21:13 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-14 22:46 ` Taras Kondratiuk
2014-01-14 23:44 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-02-13 17:47 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D5A60C.7080800@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-networking@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=victor.kamensky@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).