From: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Add support for Erratum 2.1.1.128 in device tree boot
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 19:40:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F2465A.6060804@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F104B7.6040606@ti.com>
On Tuesday 04 February 2014 08:48 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 06:44 AM, Balaji T K wrote:
>> On Tuesday 21 January 2014 04:59 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> When device is booted using devicetree, platforms impacted by
>>> Erratum 2.1.1.128 is not detected easily in the mmc driver. This erratum
>>> indicates that the module cannot do multi-block transfers.
>>>
>>> Handle this by providing a boolean flag to indicate to driver that it is
>>> working on a hardware with mentioned limitation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This explains the logs I see:
>>> OMAP3430 LDP (ES2.2):
>>> uImage only boot: http://slexy.org/raw/s2YrbMAi7c
>>> uImage+dtb concatenated boot: http://slexy.org/raw/s20qVg17T0
>>>
>>> With the following flag set, device is now able to consistently boot with
>>> device tree supported uImage+dtb concat boot.
>>>
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt | 2 ++
>>> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 3 +++
>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
>>> index 8c8908a..ab36f8b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
>>> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ specifier is required.
>>> dma-names: List of DMA request names. These strings correspond
>>> 1:1 with the DMA specifiers listed in dmas. The string naming is
>>> to be "rx" and "tx" for RX and TX DMA requests, respectively.
>>> +ti,erratum-2.1.1.128: boolean, for OMAP3430/OMAP35xx platforms with broken
>>> +multiblock reads
>>
>> Rather than ti,errata.. specific property, something like
>> caps no/disable multiblock read is more readable in my opinion, Otherwise
>
> Is'nt the better definition to state i have quirk X and allow the
> driver to do the necessary thing/things needed to handle quirk X? in
> this case, there is just one thing to do: broken multi_block_read, in
> the case of other quirks, there might be more than 1 thing to do.. let
> driver figure that out, dts just states the h/w capabilty or in this
> case, the quirk capability.
>
But in this case there is only one. disable multi block read is more readable
than the errata reference, No strong feelings though.
>>
>> Acked-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>
>>
>>>
>>> Examples:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>>> index 014bfe5..f2d5940 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>>> @@ -1730,6 +1730,9 @@ static struct omap_mmc_platform_data *of_get_hsmmc_pdata(struct device *dev)
>>> if (of_find_property(np, "ti,dual-volt", NULL))
>>> pdata->controller_flags |= OMAP_HSMMC_SUPPORTS_DUAL_VOLT;
>>>
>>> + if (of_find_property(np, "ti,erratum-2.1.1.128", NULL))
>>> + pdata->controller_flags |= OMAP_HSMMC_BROKEN_MULTIBLOCK_READ;
>>> +
>>> /* This driver only supports 1 slot */
>>> pdata->nr_slots = 1;
>>> pdata->slots[0].switch_pin = cd_gpio;
>>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-05 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-20 23:29 [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Add support for Erratum 2.1.1.128 in device tree boot Nishanth Menon
2014-01-20 23:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-21 17:38 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-21 18:05 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-21 19:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-21 19:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-02-04 12:44 ` Balaji T K
2014-02-04 15:18 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-02-05 14:10 ` Balaji T K [this message]
2014-02-05 14:12 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-02-13 23:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-02-14 5:48 ` Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F2465A.6060804@ti.com \
--to=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=chris@printf.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).