From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: regression(ti platforms): next-20140210 (ehci?) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:22:05 -0600 Message-ID: <52F8FCAD.9080006@ti.com> References: <52F8F77B.70605@ti.com> <52F8FA37.1020709@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:33451 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752564AbaBJQWG (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:22:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <52F8FA37.1020709@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Roger Quadros , linux-omap , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, "Balbi, Felipe" Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On 02/10/2014 10:11 AM, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 02/10/2014 05:59 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> A quick note to report that I saw regression in today's next tag (logs >> indicate around EHCI) boot on various TI platforms: >> >> Note: crane and sdp2430 are not expected to pass with >> multi_v7_defconfig (note: omap2plus_defconfig boot seems to be sane >> but USB is disabled there) > > I'll take a look what's happening. Thanks. > Funny thing is that am335x doesn't even have an EHCI controller. I dont think any of the am335x platforms fail - just OMAP3,4 platforms which do fail. Side note: all platforms are tested with device tree boot (not the legacy boot). -- Regards, Nishanth Menon