From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Vaussard Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: Fixes for Overo/Tobi against 3.14-rc1 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:07:53 +0100 Message-ID: <52FA20A9.2060702@epfl.ch> References: <1391677818-21154-1-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> <87d2j0rwv8.fsf@paris.lan> Reply-To: florian.vaussard@epfl.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp0.epfl.ch ([128.178.224.218]:57304 "EHLO smtp0.epfl.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218AbaBKNIA (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:08:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87d2j0rwv8.fsf@paris.lan> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman , Tony Lindgren Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudCBDb3Vzc29u?= , Tero Kristo , Mike Turquette , linux-omap , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi, On 02/06/2014 06:09 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Florian Vaussard writes: > >> OMAP36xx-based Overo (Storm and alike) are now failing to boot with 3.14-rc1 [1]. >> This series fixes this, by moving model-agnostic DT into a common dtsi file, >> and creating model-specific DT files: >> >> - omap3-overo-tobi.dts -> older OMAP35xx Overo >> - omap3-overo-storm-tobi.dts -> newer OMAP36xx/AM37xx/DM37xx Overo >> >> People will have to use the right Overo / expansion board combination. >> >> (Patch 2 in an unrelated fix that was waiting in my queue.) >> >> omap3-overo-tobi.dts tested with Overo Sand (OMAP3503) and omap3-overo-storm-tobi.dts >> tested with Overo EarthStorm (AM3703). Both boot. With the Overo Sand, I cannot >> mount the ext3 rootfs, but this seems unrelated to the current topic, maybe >> a missing errata. > > And I tested with my 35xx/Overo with omap3-overo-tobi.dts and my > 37xx/Overo STORM with omap3-overo-storm-tobi.dts and they're both > working. > > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman > > Tony, with your ack, I can apply these directly to arm-soc/fixes. > > Florian, thanks for the fixes. > This issue is still present in 3.14-rc2. Shall I send a v2, including the suggestion of Nishanth, against 3.14-rc2? Regards, Florian