From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] AM43xx & OMAP5 DSS DT changes Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:31:51 +0300 Message-ID: <537CC6E7.6010103@ti.com> References: <1400676625-30078-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <20140521150231.GH17417@atomide.com> <537CC376.5050501@ti.com> <20140521152613.GJ17417@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PJU0SRQeu2U1loGowfagUugbs6N11vlTa" Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:55868 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752719AbaEUPcX (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 11:32:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140521152613.GJ17417@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org --PJU0SRQeu2U1loGowfagUugbs6N11vlTa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/05/14 18:26, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tomi Valkeinen [140521 08:18]: >> On 21/05/14 18:02, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Tomi Valkeinen [140521 05:51]: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Here are the AM43xx and OMAP5 display DT changes again. I've sent th= e clock >>>> related changes separately, and I removed OMAP5's RFBI node, which d= epends on >>>> more clock changes. The RFBI driver doesn't work at the moment anywa= y, so >>>> removing the RFBI node should not be an issue. >>>> >>>> Tony, if these look fine (the rfbi change is the only one compared t= o the >>>> previous versions), can you queue them for 3.16? >>> >>> Probably best that you do a late branch again after arm-soc dts chang= es >>> have been merged. Sounds like you have at least that macro dependency= >>> to omap-for-v3.16/dt-v2 so you should probably base your branch on >> >> There are no dependencies that I know of. Which macro dependency is th= at? >=20 > Oh for the "[PATCH v2] ARM: dts: duovero-parlor: Add HDMI output" that > now uses the OMAP4_IOPAD macro. Ok. But generally, isn't it better if the .dts changes go through your tree? None of the display related .dts changes have any dependencies to omapdss as such. I can collect the patches, as I've done, to let them mature a bit in my tree, but I'd rather get them merged via your dt branch. Tomi --PJU0SRQeu2U1loGowfagUugbs6N11vlTa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTfMbnAAoJEPo9qoy8lh71ISkP/1nXnnvzj65Htv+JmafHn0X6 ufA7GXJYWrNQRQ3yQ6/c2xHcdzFK5hUI74aqZil6+hEWDeCeCK/wZfeSOjKsHE5Q T4CJfxCDmGEnH7Jh5ERVhh22s/i1Jkb3Rnh+CybY1Me4MEMefHH7IdiiD4FRLCSY Dga4dyxXRSIJ5Xmq5LqZgWFeuqqFSrZ7xv1urA0i0GzVmsnBvPYU5J+Ct82oL1mu Sh2803leeo6Dgmwt4xSfNqb9o4dydT/rAFCzB8I1ib0EPDU2gR4sJy5R7Q+3pYtg NPRWhabVTJyNMgfwaXSJyTUCq5EaZj6R/K3WLznY9eTI7+VAHG4JlET6EmyaVaOt ERp0FbLC3bj29V+9LA2W1hV8nkZ/L4nOEPEz34u225ikz8iO0MoFhPg3Z6s1yH+9 r/j1/knH0nrOfRFZKtHNKG9HR84CNT/lUCRDiAfqKaE/n1cZUCJiwQNniXJlgK11 WBoxZsE5kbnOGFaqs97Z+91WByQMN9TI90QW4MYAoBAYLevm5jqhbtOb8O1TGnD9 QY9hMFWq2ADqW4SdHJ/TY2/+YV76MlLphvIRjSbfk/4Y9x00w0sky+dO+6jSU1Cr 34jJfCHOrLoReOOpQtSTut+XEt4BDYDthrsTJZC0Z9vVF39i8gQG2iiLUcBgcHcE uzHqRpoNqlRXoOKWyvXS =8z5q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PJU0SRQeu2U1loGowfagUugbs6N11vlTa--