From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: omap5/dra7xx: Fix counter frequency drift for AM572x errata i856. Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:56:16 -0600 Message-ID: <54908E60.5080109@ti.com> References: <358281a880ccd89873efeea75edaa6c953eac2bd.1418421100.git.lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20141214044517.GD24110@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <549018EC.8020207@ti.com> <20141216161614.GK24110@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141216161614.GK24110@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lennart Sorensen , Lokesh Vutla Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Kristo, Tero" , Sekhar Nori List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 12/16/2014 10:16 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 05:05:08PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> Is this applicable for OMAP5 also? >> If not can you drop omap5 from $subject? > > DRA7xx = OMAP57xx, which to me is an omap5. Isn't it? *AM*57xx is not *OMAP*57xx -> there is no OMAP57xx. AM57xx and DRA7xx are in the same generation of processors and is derivative technology (not the same) as OMAP5432/OMAP5430. We have been using DRA7 as a generic terminology to indicate AM57xx/DRA7 family of processors. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon