Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	mkl@pengutronix.de, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, wsa@the-dreams.de,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: c_can: use regmap_update_bits() to modify RAMINIT register
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:37:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B3C001.501@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150112120541.GD4160@sirena.org.uk>

On 12/01/15 14:05, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:02:21PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> +Mark with correct id.
> 
> Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs, it amkes
> your mail more legible.

Fixed now. Thanks for pointing out.

> 
>>> The problem here is we can't use regmap_update_bits() because we need to write a 1 to the DONE bit to clear it and _regmap_update_bits() doesn't allow us to do that because of commit
>>> d91e8db2c3bb regmap: Suppress noop writes in regmap_update_bits()
>>>
>>> Is reverting it going to cause other issues? If yes then can we have a flag to specify forced update?
> 
> The usual thing to do here is an explicit write clearing the latch,
> either immediately after setting it or immediately before setting it.
> If the register is marked as volatile and the hardware doesn't read back
> the latched state that also does the trick.
> 

How does this work if driver has access to only 1 bit that can only be
written with 1 to clear a condition? Writing a 0 is no-op.
It can read back 0 or 1 depending on the condition.

I didn't understand the volatile trick :P.

cheers,
-roger


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-12 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-07 14:32 [PATCH] can: c_can: use regmap_update_bits() to modify RAMINIT register Roger Quadros
2015-01-09 13:50 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-01-12  9:57   ` Roger Quadros
2015-01-12 10:02     ` Roger Quadros
2015-01-12 12:05       ` Mark Brown
2015-01-12 12:37         ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2015-01-12 12:43           ` Mark Brown
2015-01-13 14:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Roger Quadros
2015-01-15 14:37   ` Marc Kleine-Budde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B3C001.501@ti.com \
    --to=rogerq@ti.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox