From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Quentin Lambert Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:01:34 +0100 Message-ID: <54D482EE.6050004@gmail.com> References: <1422011024-32283-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <1422011024-32283-4-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <20150201212432.22722.70917@quantum> <54CFE1FE.7040404@codeaurora.org> <54CFFBCF.90706@codeaurora.org> <20150202225036.421.43421@quantum> <54D0F179.1040906@gmail.com> <54D2AA9B.7010800@codeaurora.org> <54D3900A.9060200@gmail.com> <54D423C3.9030105@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54D423C3.9030105@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd , Mike Turquette , Julia Lawall Cc: Paul Walmsley , Tomeu Vizoso , Tony Lindgren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, t-kristo@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 06/02/2015 03:15, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Thanks for the coccinelle patch. Thinking more about it, I don't think > we care if the pointer is dereferenced because that would require a > definition of struct clk and that is most likely not the case outside of > the clock framework. Did you scan the entire kernel? No I haven't. > I'm running it now > but it seems to be taking a while. > Yes, that's why, as a first step, I chose to limit the scan to the arm directory.