From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Quadros Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: add bus children Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:26:06 +0200 Message-ID: <54EDF79E.4010104@ti.com> References: <1424808331-17592-1-git-send-email-rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> <1424808331-17592-2-git-send-email-rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> <1424808331-17592-3-git-send-email-rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> <54EDB9F0.9030701@ti.com> <54EDE4F1.10000@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> <54EDF5DE.9010607@ti.com> <54EDF6E5.9070405@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54EDF6E5.9070405@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 25/02/15 18:23, Robert Abel wrote: > Hi Roger, > > On 25 Feb 2015 17:18, Roger Quadros wrote: >> OK. Would be interesting to see how unconditional call to of_platform_decide_create() behaves >> for your case. > I'm not able to test today, so results will be in tomorrow. If that doesn't work, I'll just resubmit my first patch with the conditional. Tomorrow is fine. > > I'll be posting a v3 of this entire patch series tomorrow after testing. I think I should leave your ACKs out for you to re-ACK? If you are not changing the patches I've acked you can keep my ACK. cheers, -roger