linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Brian Hutchinson <b.hutchman@gmail.com>,
	Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: ti: Implement FAPLL set_rate for the synthesizer
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:53:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5511B28E.5040800@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150324163734.GY31346@atomide.com>

On 03/24/2015 06:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [150323 08:58]:
>> * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [150323 06:25]:
>>>
>>> This code is generating these compile time warnings for me:
>>>
>>>    CC      drivers/clk/ti/fapll.o
>>> drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c: In function ‘ti_fapll_synth_set_rate’:
>>> drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c:394:5: warning: ‘synth_int_div’ may be used
>>> uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
>>> drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c:373:18: note: ‘synth_int_div’ was declared here
>>> drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c:400:23: warning: ‘synth_frac_div’ may be used
>>> uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
>>> drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c:373:33: note: ‘synth_frac_div’ was declared here
>>
>> Oops thanks will check. I did move this into a separate function
>> to make it more readable, probably happened at that point.
>
> Updated version of this patch below, let me know if you want the
> whole set reposted.

Yes this is fine, all patches queued for 4.1, thanks!

-Tero

>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
> 8< -------------------
> From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:04:20 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] clk: ti: Implement FAPLL set_rate for the synthesizer
>
> We can pretty much get any rate out of the FAPLL because of the fractional
> divider. Let's first try just adjusting the post divider, and if that is
> not enough, then reprogram both the fractional divider and the post divider.
>
> Let's also add a define for the fixed SYNTH_PHASE_K instead of using 8.
>
> Cc: Brian Hutchinson <b.hutchman@gmail.com>
> Cc: Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com>
> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>
> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>   #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>   #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/math64.h>
>   #include <linux/of.h>
>   #include <linux/of_address.h>
>   #include <linux/clk/ti.h>
> @@ -47,6 +48,8 @@
>   /* Synthesizer frequency register */
>   #define SYNTH_LDFREQ		BIT(31)
>
> +#define SYNTH_PHASE_K		8
> +#define SYNTH_MAX_INT_DIV	0xf
>   #define SYNTH_MAX_DIV_M		0xff
>
>   struct fapll_data {
> @@ -204,7 +207,7 @@ static unsigned long ti_fapll_synth_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>   	/*
>   	 * Synth frequency integer and fractional divider.
>   	 * Note that the phase output K is 8, so the result needs
> -	 * to be multiplied by 8.
> +	 * to be multiplied by SYNTH_PHASE_K.
>   	 */
>   	if (synth->freq) {
>   		u32 v, synth_int_div, synth_frac_div, synth_div_freq;
> @@ -215,7 +218,7 @@ static unsigned long ti_fapll_synth_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>   		synth_div_freq = (synth_int_div * 10000000) + synth_frac_div;
>   		rate *= 10000000;
>   		do_div(rate, synth_div_freq);
> -		rate *= 8;
> +		rate *= SYNTH_PHASE_K;
>   	}
>
>   	/* Synth post-divider M */
> @@ -224,11 +227,138 @@ static unsigned long ti_fapll_synth_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>   	return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(rate, synth_div_m);
>   }
>
> +static unsigned long ti_fapll_synth_get_frac_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +						  unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct fapll_synth *synth = to_synth(hw);
> +	unsigned long current_rate, frac_rate;
> +	u32 post_div_m;
> +
> +	current_rate = ti_fapll_synth_recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate);
> +	post_div_m = readl_relaxed(synth->div) & SYNTH_MAX_DIV_M;
> +	frac_rate = current_rate * post_div_m;
> +
> +	return frac_rate;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 ti_fapll_synth_set_frac_rate(struct fapll_synth *synth,
> +					unsigned long rate,
> +					unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	u32 post_div_m, synth_int_div = 0, synth_frac_div = 0, v;
> +
> +	post_div_m = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate * SYNTH_PHASE_K, rate);
> +	post_div_m = post_div_m / SYNTH_MAX_INT_DIV;
> +	if (post_div_m > SYNTH_MAX_DIV_M)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (!post_div_m)
> +		post_div_m = 1;
> +
> +	for (; post_div_m < SYNTH_MAX_DIV_M; post_div_m++) {
> +		synth_int_div = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate *
> +						 SYNTH_PHASE_K *
> +						 10000000,
> +						 rate * post_div_m);
> +		synth_frac_div = synth_int_div % 10000000;
> +		synth_int_div /= 10000000;
> +
> +		if (synth_int_div <= SYNTH_MAX_INT_DIV)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (synth_int_div > SYNTH_MAX_INT_DIV)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	v = readl_relaxed(synth->freq);
> +	v &= ~0x1fffffff;
> +	v |= (synth_int_div & SYNTH_MAX_INT_DIV) << 24;
> +	v |= (synth_frac_div & 0xffffff);
> +	v |= SYNTH_LDFREQ;
> +	writel_relaxed(v, synth->freq);
> +
> +	return post_div_m;
> +}
> +
> +static long ti_fapll_synth_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +				      unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct fapll_synth *synth = to_synth(hw);
> +	struct fapll_data *fd = synth->fd;
> +	unsigned long r;
> +
> +	if (ti_fapll_clock_is_bypass(fd) || !synth->div || !rate)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Only post divider m available with no fractional divider? */
> +	if (!synth->freq) {
> +		unsigned long frac_rate;
> +		u32 synth_post_div_m;
> +
> +		frac_rate = ti_fapll_synth_get_frac_rate(hw, *parent_rate);
> +		synth_post_div_m = DIV_ROUND_UP(frac_rate, rate);
> +		r = DIV_ROUND_UP(frac_rate, synth_post_div_m);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	r = *parent_rate * SYNTH_PHASE_K;
> +	if (rate > r)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	r = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(r, SYNTH_MAX_INT_DIV * SYNTH_MAX_DIV_M);
> +	if (rate < r)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	r = rate;
> +out:
> +	return r;
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_fapll_synth_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +				   unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct fapll_synth *synth = to_synth(hw);
> +	struct fapll_data *fd = synth->fd;
> +	unsigned long frac_rate, post_rate = 0;
> +	u32 post_div_m = 0, v;
> +
> +	if (ti_fapll_clock_is_bypass(fd) || !synth->div || !rate)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Produce the rate with just post divider M? */
> +	frac_rate = ti_fapll_synth_get_frac_rate(hw, parent_rate);
> +	if (frac_rate < rate) {
> +		if (!synth->freq)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +	} else {
> +		post_div_m = DIV_ROUND_UP(frac_rate, rate);
> +		if (post_div_m && (post_div_m <= SYNTH_MAX_DIV_M))
> +			post_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(frac_rate, post_div_m);
> +		if (!synth->freq && !post_rate)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Need to recalculate the fractional divider? */
> +	if ((post_rate != rate) && synth->freq)
> +		post_div_m = ti_fapll_synth_set_frac_rate(synth,
> +							  rate,
> +							  parent_rate);
> +
> +	v = readl_relaxed(synth->div);
> +	v &= ~SYNTH_MAX_DIV_M;
> +	v |= post_div_m;
> +	v |= SYNTH_LDMDIV1;
> +	writel_relaxed(v, synth->div);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static struct clk_ops ti_fapll_synt_ops = {
>   	.enable = ti_fapll_synth_enable,
>   	.disable = ti_fapll_synth_disable,
>   	.is_enabled = ti_fapll_synth_is_enabled,
>   	.recalc_rate = ti_fapll_synth_recalc_rate,
> +	.round_rate = ti_fapll_synth_round_rate,
> +	.set_rate = ti_fapll_synth_set_rate,
>   };
>
>   static struct clk * __init ti_fapll_synth_setup(struct fapll_data *fd,
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-24 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-22 22:35 [PATCH 0/3] Implement set_rate for FAPLL on dm816x Tony Lindgren
2015-03-22 22:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] clk: ti: Fix FAPLL recalc_rate for rounding errors Tony Lindgren
2015-03-22 22:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] clk: ti: Implement FAPLL set_rate for the synthesizer Tony Lindgren
2015-03-23 13:25   ` Tero Kristo
2015-03-23 15:52     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-24 16:37       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-24 18:53         ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2015-03-22 22:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] clk: ti: Implement FAPLL set_rate for the PLL Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5511B28E.5040800@ti.com \
    --to=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=b.hutchman@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthijsvanduin@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).