linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	"Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org" <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	ssantosh@kernel.org,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 2/2] gpio: omap: ensure that runtime pm will disable unused gpio banks
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:59:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5540F1B8.5030407@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150429143320.GA24469@atomide.com>

On 4/29/15 7:33 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org> [150417 10:33]:
>> Hi Tony,
>> On 04/16/2015 07:29 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [150319 16:08]:
>>>> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [150307 00:08]:
>>>>> * grygorii.strashko@linaro.org <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org> [150306 11:27]:
>>>>>> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now there are two points related to Runtime PM usage:
>>>>>> 1) bank state doesn't need to be checked in places where
>>>>>> Rintime PM is used, bacause Runtime PM maintains its
>>>>>> own usage counter:
>>>>>>         if (!BANK_USED(bank))
>>>>>>                  pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
>>>>>> so, it's safe to drop such checks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) There is a call of pm_runtime_get_sync() in omap_gpio_irq_type(),
>>>>>> but no corresponding put. As result, GPIO devices could be
>>>>>> powered on forever if at least one GPIO was used as IRQ.
>>>>>> Hence, allow powering off GPIO banks by adding missed
>>>>>> pm_runtime_put(bank->dev) at the end of omap_gpio_irq_type().
>>>>>
>>>>> Nice to see this happening, but I think before merging this we need
>>>>> to test to be sure that the pm_runtime calls actually match.. I'm
>>>>> not convinced right now.. We may still have uninitialized entry
>>>>> points similar to 3d009c8c61f9 ("gpio: omap: Fix bad device
>>>>> access with setup_irq()").
>>>>
>>>> OK so I finally got around testing this along with your bank
>>>> removal set. Looks like this patch causes a regression at least
>>>> with n900 keyboard LEDs with off-idle. The LED won't come back
>>>> on after restore from off-idle. Anyways, now we have something
>>>> reproducable :) So I'll try to debug it further at some point,
>>>> might be few days before I get to it.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay, finally got around to this one :)
>>>
>>> Here's what I came up with, only lightly tested so far. Note that
>>> we need to keep the PM runtime per bank, not per GPIO. Will repost
>>> a proper patch after some more testing.
>>
>> I've had a opposite idea actually ;) - use Runtime PM on per-gpio basis as
>> it maintains all needed counters inside and we can be sure that
>> PM runtime callbacks will be called once per bank.
>
> Sorry looks like I missed this email earlier, the mail got buried
> in all the threads in my inbox.
>
> Anyways, we still need per bank pm runtime for a while until we
> can make it per GPIO.
>
>> Also, I've thought about moving the code from omap_enable_gpio_module()
>> into Runtime PM callbacks.
>> So, final goal - get rid of BANK_USED & LINE_USED.
>>
>> Were you able to identify broken calls sequence?
>
> No, but it breaks things for omap3 off idle. And then I noticed all
> the duplicate code as discussed in the newer thread.
>
>> Also, Pay attention pls, that omap2_gpio_prepare_for/resume_after_idle()
>> will be most probably a NOP now.
>
> Looks like we can't do that change yet, it breaks omap3 off idle.
>
The issue is across OMAPs. Those stupid debounce clocks won't let the
GPIO block to idle. They are called optional clocks but actually they
aren't.

Regards,
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-29 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-06 19:26 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: omap: irq_shutdown: remove unnecessary call of gpiochip_unlock_as_irq grygorii.strashko
2015-03-06 19:26 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 2/2] gpio: omap: ensure that runtime pm will disable unused gpio banks grygorii.strashko
2015-03-06 23:15   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-19 23:03     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-16 16:29       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-17 17:32         ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org
2015-04-29 14:33           ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-29 14:59             ` santosh.shilimkar [this message]
2015-03-09 17:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: omap: irq_shutdown: remove unnecessary call of gpiochip_unlock_as_irq Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5540F1B8.5030407@oracle.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@linaro.org \
    --cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).