* [PATCH 1/6] ARM: OMAP4: PRM: Remove hardcoding of PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET register
2015-06-22 6:22 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: AM437x: Add IO wake up support Keerthy
@ 2015-06-22 6:22 ` Keerthy
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: AM43xx: Add the PRM IRQ register offsets Keerthy
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2015-06-22 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-omap, tony
Cc: galak, t-kristo, pawel.moll, linux-kernel, paul, bcousson,
linux-clk, j-keerthy
PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET need not be same for all SOCs hence
remove hardcoding and use the value provided by the omap_prcm_irq_setup
structure.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c | 11 ++++++-----
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
index 6ae0b3a..2e60406 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
@@ -494,6 +494,7 @@ struct omap_prcm_irq {
struct omap_prcm_irq_setup {
u16 ack;
u16 mask;
+ u16 pm_ctrl;
u8 nr_regs;
u8 nr_irqs;
const struct omap_prcm_irq *irqs;
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
index 4541700..8149e5a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static const struct omap_prcm_irq omap4_prcm_irqs[] = {
static struct omap_prcm_irq_setup omap4_prcm_irq_setup = {
.ack = OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET,
.mask = OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
+ .pm_ctrl = OMAP4_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET,
.nr_regs = 2,
.irqs = omap4_prcm_irqs,
.nr_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(omap4_prcm_irqs),
@@ -306,10 +307,10 @@ static void omap44xx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
omap4_prm_rmw_inst_reg_bits(OMAP4430_WUCLK_CTRL_MASK,
OMAP4430_WUCLK_CTRL_MASK,
inst,
- OMAP4_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET);
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.pm_ctrl);
omap_test_timeout(
(((omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(inst,
- OMAP4_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET) &
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.pm_ctrl) &
OMAP4430_WUCLK_STATUS_MASK) >>
OMAP4430_WUCLK_STATUS_SHIFT) == 1),
MAX_IOPAD_LATCH_TIME, i);
@@ -319,10 +320,10 @@ static void omap44xx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
/* Trigger WUCLKIN disable */
omap4_prm_rmw_inst_reg_bits(OMAP4430_WUCLK_CTRL_MASK, 0x0,
inst,
- OMAP4_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET);
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.pm_ctrl);
omap_test_timeout(
(((omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(inst,
- OMAP4_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET) &
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.pm_ctrl) &
OMAP4430_WUCLK_STATUS_MASK) >>
OMAP4430_WUCLK_STATUS_SHIFT) == 0),
MAX_IOPAD_LATCH_TIME, i);
@@ -350,7 +351,7 @@ static void __init omap44xx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
omap4_prm_rmw_inst_reg_bits(OMAP4430_GLOBAL_WUEN_MASK,
OMAP4430_GLOBAL_WUEN_MASK,
inst,
- OMAP4_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET);
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.pm_ctrl);
}
/**
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/6] ARM: AM43xx: Add the PRM IRQ register offsets
2015-06-22 6:22 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: AM437x: Add IO wake up support Keerthy
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: OMAP4: PRM: Remove hardcoding of PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET register Keerthy
@ 2015-06-22 6:22 ` Keerthy
2015-07-07 11:55 ` Tero Kristo
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: dts: AM4372: Add PRCM IRQ entry Keerthy
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2015-06-22 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-omap, tony
Cc: galak, t-kristo, pawel.moll, linux-kernel, paul, bcousson,
linux-clk, j-keerthy
Add the PRM IRQ register offsets.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm43xx.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm43xx.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm43xx.h
index d026199..ec1ac5c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm43xx.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm43xx.h
@@ -25,6 +25,10 @@
#define AM43XX_PRM_WKUP_INST 0x2000
#define AM43XX_PRM_DEVICE_INST 0x4000
+/* PRM_IRQ offsets */
+#define AM43XX_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET 0x0004
+#define AM43XX_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET 0x0008
+
/* RM RSTCTRL offsets */
#define AM43XX_RM_PER_RSTCTRL_OFFSET 0x0010
#define AM43XX_RM_GFX_RSTCTRL_OFFSET 0x0010
@@ -146,4 +150,5 @@
#define AM43XX_CM_PER_HDQ1W_CLKCTRL_OFFSET 0x04a0
#define AM43XX_CM_PER_VPFE0_CLKCTRL_OFFSET 0x0068
#define AM43XX_CM_PER_VPFE1_CLKCTRL_OFFSET 0x0070
+#define AM43XX_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET 0x0024
#endif
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: AM43xx: Add the PRM IRQ register offsets
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: AM43xx: Add the PRM IRQ register offsets Keerthy
@ 2015-07-07 11:55 ` Tero Kristo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tero Kristo @ 2015-07-07 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keerthy, linux-omap, tony
Cc: galak, pawel.moll, linux-kernel, paul, bcousson, linux-clk
On 06/22/2015 09:22 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> Add the PRM IRQ register offsets.
This patch doesn't apply cleanly to 4.2-rc1.
-Tero
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm43xx.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm43xx.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm43xx.h
> index d026199..ec1ac5c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm43xx.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm43xx.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@
> #define AM43XX_PRM_WKUP_INST 0x2000
> #define AM43XX_PRM_DEVICE_INST 0x4000
>
> +/* PRM_IRQ offsets */
> +#define AM43XX_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET 0x0004
> +#define AM43XX_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET 0x0008
> +
> /* RM RSTCTRL offsets */
> #define AM43XX_RM_PER_RSTCTRL_OFFSET 0x0010
> #define AM43XX_RM_GFX_RSTCTRL_OFFSET 0x0010
> @@ -146,4 +150,5 @@
> #define AM43XX_CM_PER_HDQ1W_CLKCTRL_OFFSET 0x04a0
> #define AM43XX_CM_PER_VPFE0_CLKCTRL_OFFSET 0x0068
> #define AM43XX_CM_PER_VPFE1_CLKCTRL_OFFSET 0x0070
> +#define AM43XX_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET 0x0024
> #endif
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/6] ARM: dts: AM4372: Add PRCM IRQ entry
2015-06-22 6:22 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: AM437x: Add IO wake up support Keerthy
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: OMAP4: PRM: Remove hardcoding of PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET register Keerthy
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: AM43xx: Add the PRM IRQ register offsets Keerthy
@ 2015-06-22 6:22 ` Keerthy
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: OMAP: PRM: Remove hardcoding of IRQENABLE_MPU_2 and IRQSTATUS_MPU_2 register offsets Keerthy
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2015-06-22 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-omap, tony
Cc: galak, t-kristo, pawel.moll, linux-kernel, paul, bcousson,
linux-clk, j-keerthy
Add PRCM IRQ entry.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
index 1680602..7bcdeb2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
prcm: prcm@1f0000 {
compatible = "ti,am4-prcm";
reg = <0x1f0000 0x11000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
prcm_clocks: clocks {
#address-cells = <1>;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/6] ARM: OMAP: PRM: Remove hardcoding of IRQENABLE_MPU_2 and IRQSTATUS_MPU_2 register offsets
2015-06-22 6:22 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: AM437x: Add IO wake up support Keerthy
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: dts: AM4372: Add PRCM IRQ entry Keerthy
@ 2015-06-22 6:22 ` Keerthy
2015-07-07 11:51 ` Tero Kristo
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: Add AM437x specific data Keerthy
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: PRM: AM437x: Enable IO wakeup feature Keerthy
5 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2015-06-22 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-omap, tony
Cc: galak, t-kristo, pawel.moll, linux-kernel, paul, bcousson,
linux-clk, j-keerthy
The register offsets of IRQENABLE_MPU_2 and IRQSTATUS_MPU_2 are hardcoded.
This makes it difficult to reuse the code for single core SoCs like AM437x.
Hence making it part of omap_prcm_irq_setup structure so that case of
single set of IRQ* registers can be handled generically.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h | 8 ++++----
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 20 +++++++++---------
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c | 5 ++---
4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
index 2e60406..99447e7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
@@ -470,8 +470,8 @@ struct omap_prcm_irq {
/**
* struct omap_prcm_irq_setup - PRCM interrupt controller details
- * @ack: PRM register offset for the first PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU register
- * @mask: PRM register offset for the first PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU register
+ * @ack: PRM register offsets for the PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU registers
+ * @mask: PRM register offsets for the PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU registers
* @nr_regs: number of PRM_IRQ{STATUS,ENABLE}_MPU* registers
* @nr_irqs: number of entries in the @irqs array
* @irqs: ptr to an array of PRCM interrupt bits (see @nr_irqs)
@@ -492,8 +492,8 @@ struct omap_prcm_irq {
* specified in static initializers.
*/
struct omap_prcm_irq_setup {
- u16 ack;
- u16 mask;
+ u16 ack[2];
+ u16 mask[2];
u16 pm_ctrl;
u8 nr_regs;
u8 nr_irqs;
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
index 62680aa..56649b0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ static const struct omap_prcm_irq omap3_prcm_irqs[] = {
};
static struct omap_prcm_irq_setup omap3_prcm_irq_setup = {
- .ack = OMAP3_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET,
- .mask = OMAP3_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
+ .ack[0] = OMAP3_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET,
+ .mask[0] = OMAP3_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
.nr_regs = 1,
.irqs = omap3_prcm_irqs,
.nr_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(omap3_prcm_irqs),
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static u32 omap3_prm_vp_check_txdone(u8 vp_id)
u32 irqstatus;
irqstatus = omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(OCP_MOD,
- OMAP3_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET);
+ omap3_prcm_irq_setup.ack[0]);
return irqstatus & vp->tranxdone_status;
}
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_vp_clear_txdone(u8 vp_id)
struct omap3_vp *vp = &omap3_vp[vp_id];
omap2_prm_write_mod_reg(vp->tranxdone_status,
- OCP_MOD, OMAP3_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET);
+ OCP_MOD, omap3_prcm_irq_setup.ack[0]);
}
u32 omap3_prm_vcvp_read(u8 offset)
@@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ static void omap3xxx_prm_read_pending_irqs(unsigned long *events)
u32 mask, st;
/* XXX Can the mask read be avoided (e.g., can it come from RAM?) */
- mask = omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(OCP_MOD, OMAP3_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
- st = omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(OCP_MOD, OMAP3_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET);
+ mask = omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(OCP_MOD, omap3_prcm_irq_setup.mask[0]);
+ st = omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(OCP_MOD, omap3_prcm_irq_setup.ack[0]);
events[0] = mask & st;
}
@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ static void omap3xxx_prm_ocp_barrier(void)
static void omap3xxx_prm_save_and_clear_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
{
saved_mask[0] = omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(OCP_MOD,
- OMAP3_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
- omap2_prm_write_mod_reg(0, OCP_MOD, OMAP3_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
+ omap3_prcm_irq_setup.mask[0]);
+ omap2_prm_write_mod_reg(0, OCP_MOD, omap3_prcm_irq_setup.mask[0]);
/* OCP barrier */
omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(OCP_MOD, OMAP3_PRM_REVISION_OFFSET);
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void omap3xxx_prm_save_and_clear_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
static void omap3xxx_prm_restore_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
{
omap2_prm_write_mod_reg(saved_mask[0], OCP_MOD,
- OMAP3_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
+ omap3_prcm_irq_setup.mask[0]);
}
/**
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ void __init omap3_prm_init_pm(bool has_uart4, bool has_iva)
OMAP2_RM_RSTST);
/* Clear any pending PRCM interrupts */
- omap2_prm_write_mod_reg(0, OCP_MOD, OMAP3_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET);
+ omap2_prm_write_mod_reg(0, OCP_MOD, omap3_prcm_irq_setup.ack[0]);
/* We need to idle iva2_pwrdm even on am3703 with no iva2. */
omap3xxx_prm_iva_idle();
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
index 8149e5a..20b547a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
@@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ static const struct omap_prcm_irq omap4_prcm_irqs[] = {
};
static struct omap_prcm_irq_setup omap4_prcm_irq_setup = {
- .ack = OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET,
- .mask = OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
+ .ack[0] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET,
+ .mask[0] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
+ .ack[1] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_2_OFFSET,
+ .mask[1] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET,
.pm_ctrl = OMAP4_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET,
.nr_regs = 2,
.irqs = omap4_prcm_irqs,
@@ -217,11 +219,11 @@ static inline u32 _read_pending_irq_reg(u16 irqen_offs, u16 irqst_offs)
*/
static void omap44xx_prm_read_pending_irqs(unsigned long *events)
{
- events[0] = _read_pending_irq_reg(OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
- OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET);
+ int i;
- events[1] = _read_pending_irq_reg(OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET,
- OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_2_OFFSET);
+ for (i = 0; i < omap4_prcm_irq_setup.nr_regs; i++)
+ events[i] = _read_pending_irq_reg(omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i],
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.ack[i]);
}
/**
@@ -251,17 +253,16 @@ static void omap44xx_prm_ocp_barrier(void)
*/
static void omap44xx_prm_save_and_clear_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
{
- saved_mask[0] =
- omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
- OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
- saved_mask[1] =
- omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
- OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET);
+ int i;
- omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(0, OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
- OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
- omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(0, OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
- OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET);
+ for (i = 0; i < omap4_prcm_irq_setup.nr_regs; i++) {
+ saved_mask[i] =
+ omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i]);
+
+ omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(0, OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i]);
+ }
/* OCP barrier */
omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
@@ -280,10 +281,12 @@ static void omap44xx_prm_save_and_clear_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
*/
static void omap44xx_prm_restore_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
{
- omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(saved_mask[0], OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
- OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
- omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(saved_mask[1], OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
- OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < omap4_prcm_irq_setup.nr_regs; i++)
+ omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(saved_mask[i],
+ OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i]);
}
/**
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
index 7add799..10ef0da 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
@@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ int omap_prcm_register_chain_handler(struct omap_prcm_irq_setup *irq_setup)
pr_err("PRCM: already initialized; won't reinitialize\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
-
if (nr_regs > OMAP_PRCM_MAX_NR_PENDING_REG) {
pr_err("PRCM: nr_regs too large\n");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -339,8 +338,8 @@ int omap_prcm_register_chain_handler(struct omap_prcm_irq_setup *irq_setup)
ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
- ct->regs.ack = irq_setup->ack + i * 4;
- ct->regs.mask = irq_setup->mask + i * 4;
+ ct->regs.ack = irq_setup->ack[i];
+ ct->regs.mask = irq_setup->mask[i];
irq_setup_generic_chip(gc, mask[i], 0, IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0);
prcm_irq_chips[i] = gc;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: OMAP: PRM: Remove hardcoding of IRQENABLE_MPU_2 and IRQSTATUS_MPU_2 register offsets
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: OMAP: PRM: Remove hardcoding of IRQENABLE_MPU_2 and IRQSTATUS_MPU_2 register offsets Keerthy
@ 2015-07-07 11:51 ` Tero Kristo
2015-07-07 12:31 ` Keerthy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tero Kristo @ 2015-07-07 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keerthy, linux-omap, tony
Cc: galak, pawel.moll, linux-kernel, paul, bcousson, linux-clk
On 06/22/2015 09:22 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> The register offsets of IRQENABLE_MPU_2 and IRQSTATUS_MPU_2 are hardcoded.
> This makes it difficult to reuse the code for single core SoCs like AM437x.
Single core vs. having two sets of IRQENABLE / IRQSTATUS registers do
not have any relation to each other. OMAP4+ has two IRQ registers,
because the number of IRQ events is so large it does not fit into single
register. Thus, the commit message is somewhat misleading, please fix.
> Hence making it part of omap_prcm_irq_setup structure so that case of
> single set of IRQ* registers can be handled generically.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h | 8 ++++----
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 20 +++++++++---------
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c | 5 ++---
> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
> index 2e60406..99447e7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
> @@ -470,8 +470,8 @@ struct omap_prcm_irq {
>
> /**
> * struct omap_prcm_irq_setup - PRCM interrupt controller details
> - * @ack: PRM register offset for the first PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU register
> - * @mask: PRM register offset for the first PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU register
> + * @ack: PRM register offsets for the PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU registers
> + * @mask: PRM register offsets for the PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU registers
> * @nr_regs: number of PRM_IRQ{STATUS,ENABLE}_MPU* registers
> * @nr_irqs: number of entries in the @irqs array
> * @irqs: ptr to an array of PRCM interrupt bits (see @nr_irqs)
> @@ -492,8 +492,8 @@ struct omap_prcm_irq {
> * specified in static initializers.
> */
> struct omap_prcm_irq_setup {
> - u16 ack;
> - u16 mask;
> + u16 ack[2];
> + u16 mask[2];
You don't really need two pairs of offsets; in generic case, if we have
two IRQ registers, the offset between the two is 4, as used elsewhere in
the code. By keeping the previous struct layout, you can save a few
bytes of memory, and don't need to touch the omap3 code all over the
place either.
> u16 pm_ctrl;
> u8 nr_regs;
> u8 nr_irqs;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> index 62680aa..56649b0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
<snip>
No need to touch the OMAP3 code, as the offsets are always the default ones.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
> index 8149e5a..20b547a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
> @@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ static const struct omap_prcm_irq omap4_prcm_irqs[] = {
> };
>
> static struct omap_prcm_irq_setup omap4_prcm_irq_setup = {
> - .ack = OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET,
> - .mask = OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
> + .ack[0] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET,
> + .mask[0] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
> + .ack[1] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_2_OFFSET,
> + .mask[1] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET,
I think you should just keep the single IRQENABLE / IRQSTATUS
definitions in place, and use +4 addressing where applicable. Having an
array of the ack + mask definitions is kind of ugly.
> .pm_ctrl = OMAP4_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET,
> .nr_regs = 2,
> .irqs = omap4_prcm_irqs,
> @@ -217,11 +219,11 @@ static inline u32 _read_pending_irq_reg(u16 irqen_offs, u16 irqst_offs)
> */
> static void omap44xx_prm_read_pending_irqs(unsigned long *events)
> {
> - events[0] = _read_pending_irq_reg(OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET);
> + int i;
>
> - events[1] = _read_pending_irq_reg(OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET,
> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_2_OFFSET);
> + for (i = 0; i < omap4_prcm_irq_setup.nr_regs; i++)
> + events[i] = _read_pending_irq_reg(omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i],
> + omap4_prcm_irq_setup.ack[i]);
... change to mask + i * 4 / ack + i * 4.
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -251,17 +253,16 @@ static void omap44xx_prm_ocp_barrier(void)
> */
> static void omap44xx_prm_save_and_clear_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
> {
> - saved_mask[0] =
> - omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
> - saved_mask[1] =
> - omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET);
> + int i;
>
> - omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(0, OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
> - omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(0, OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET);
> + for (i = 0; i < omap4_prcm_irq_setup.nr_regs; i++) {
> + saved_mask[i] =
> + omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
> + omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i]);
> +
> + omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(0, OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
> + omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i]);
ditto.
> + }
>
> /* OCP barrier */
> omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
> @@ -280,10 +281,12 @@ static void omap44xx_prm_save_and_clear_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
> */
> static void omap44xx_prm_restore_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
> {
> - omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(saved_mask[0], OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
> - omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(saved_mask[1], OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET);
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < omap4_prcm_irq_setup.nr_regs; i++)
> + omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(saved_mask[i],
> + OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
> + omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i]);
...and here.
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
> index 7add799..10ef0da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
> @@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ int omap_prcm_register_chain_handler(struct omap_prcm_irq_setup *irq_setup)
> pr_err("PRCM: already initialized; won't reinitialize\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> -
This change is against the coding style.
> if (nr_regs > OMAP_PRCM_MAX_NR_PENDING_REG) {
> pr_err("PRCM: nr_regs too large\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -339,8 +338,8 @@ int omap_prcm_register_chain_handler(struct omap_prcm_irq_setup *irq_setup)
> ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
> ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
>
> - ct->regs.ack = irq_setup->ack + i * 4;
> - ct->regs.mask = irq_setup->mask + i * 4;
> + ct->regs.ack = irq_setup->ack[i];
> + ct->regs.mask = irq_setup->mask[i];
... and you can drop this change.
>
> irq_setup_generic_chip(gc, mask[i], 0, IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0);
> prcm_irq_chips[i] = gc;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: OMAP: PRM: Remove hardcoding of IRQENABLE_MPU_2 and IRQSTATUS_MPU_2 register offsets
2015-07-07 11:51 ` Tero Kristo
@ 2015-07-07 12:31 ` Keerthy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2015-07-07 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tero Kristo, Keerthy, linux-omap, tony
Cc: galak, pawel.moll, linux-kernel, paul, bcousson, linux-clk
On Tuesday 07 July 2015 05:21 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 06/22/2015 09:22 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> The register offsets of IRQENABLE_MPU_2 and IRQSTATUS_MPU_2 are
>> hardcoded.
>> This makes it difficult to reuse the code for single core SoCs like
>> AM437x.
>
> Single core vs. having two sets of IRQENABLE / IRQSTATUS registers do
> not have any relation to each other. OMAP4+ has two IRQ registers,
> because the number of IRQ events is so large it does not fit into single
> register. Thus, the commit message is somewhat misleading, please fix.
Okay i will make it clearer.
>
>> Hence making it part of omap_prcm_irq_setup structure so that case of
>> single set of IRQ* registers can be handled generically.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h | 8 ++++----
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 20 +++++++++---------
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c | 43
>> +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c | 5 ++---
>> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
>> index 2e60406..99447e7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm-common.h
>> @@ -470,8 +470,8 @@ struct omap_prcm_irq {
>>
>> /**
>> * struct omap_prcm_irq_setup - PRCM interrupt controller details
>> - * @ack: PRM register offset for the first PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU register
>> - * @mask: PRM register offset for the first PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU register
>> + * @ack: PRM register offsets for the PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU registers
>> + * @mask: PRM register offsets for the PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU registers
>> * @nr_regs: number of PRM_IRQ{STATUS,ENABLE}_MPU* registers
>> * @nr_irqs: number of entries in the @irqs array
>> * @irqs: ptr to an array of PRCM interrupt bits (see @nr_irqs)
>> @@ -492,8 +492,8 @@ struct omap_prcm_irq {
>> * specified in static initializers.
>> */
>> struct omap_prcm_irq_setup {
>> - u16 ack;
>> - u16 mask;
>> + u16 ack[2];
>> + u16 mask[2];
>
> You don't really need two pairs of offsets; in generic case, if we have
> two IRQ registers, the offset between the two is 4, as used elsewhere in
> the code. By keeping the previous struct layout, you can save a few
> bytes of memory, and don't need to touch the omap3 code all over the
> place either.
Okay
>
>> u16 pm_ctrl;
>> u8 nr_regs;
>> u8 nr_irqs;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
>> index 62680aa..56649b0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
>
> <snip>
>
> No need to touch the OMAP3 code, as the offsets are always the default
> ones.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
>> index 8149e5a..20b547a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
>> @@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ static const struct omap_prcm_irq omap4_prcm_irqs[]
>> = {
>> };
>>
>> static struct omap_prcm_irq_setup omap4_prcm_irq_setup = {
>> - .ack = OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET,
>> - .mask = OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
>> + .ack[0] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET,
>> + .mask[0] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
>> + .ack[1] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_2_OFFSET,
>> + .mask[1] = OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET,
>
> I think you should just keep the single IRQENABLE / IRQSTATUS
> definitions in place, and use +4 addressing where applicable. Having an
> array of the ack + mask definitions is kind of ugly.
Okay.
>
>> .pm_ctrl = OMAP4_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET,
>> .nr_regs = 2,
>> .irqs = omap4_prcm_irqs,
>> @@ -217,11 +219,11 @@ static inline u32 _read_pending_irq_reg(u16
>> irqen_offs, u16 irqst_offs)
>> */
>> static void omap44xx_prm_read_pending_irqs(unsigned long *events)
>> {
>> - events[0] = _read_pending_irq_reg(OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET,
>> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET);
>> + int i;
>>
>> - events[1] = _read_pending_irq_reg(OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET,
>> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_2_OFFSET);
>> + for (i = 0; i < omap4_prcm_irq_setup.nr_regs; i++)
>> + events[i] = _read_pending_irq_reg(omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i],
>> + omap4_prcm_irq_setup.ack[i]);
>
> ... change to mask + i * 4 / ack + i * 4.
got it.
>
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -251,17 +253,16 @@ static void omap44xx_prm_ocp_barrier(void)
>> */
>> static void omap44xx_prm_save_and_clear_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
>> {
>> - saved_mask[0] =
>> - omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
>> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
>> - saved_mask[1] =
>> - omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
>> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET);
>> + int i;
>>
>> - omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(0, OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
>> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
>> - omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(0, OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
>> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET);
>> + for (i = 0; i < omap4_prcm_irq_setup.nr_regs; i++) {
>> + saved_mask[i] =
>> + omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
>> + omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i]);
>> +
>> + omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(0, OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
>> + omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i]);
>
> ditto.
>
>> + }
>>
>> /* OCP barrier */
>> omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
>> @@ -280,10 +281,12 @@ static void
>> omap44xx_prm_save_and_clear_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
>> */
>> static void omap44xx_prm_restore_irqen(u32 *saved_mask)
>> {
>> - omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(saved_mask[0],
>> OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
>> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET);
>> - omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(saved_mask[1],
>> OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
>> - OMAP4_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_2_OFFSET);
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < omap4_prcm_irq_setup.nr_regs; i++)
>> + omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(saved_mask[i],
>> + OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
>> + omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[i]);
>
> ...and here.
>
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
>> index 7add799..10ef0da 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
>> @@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ int omap_prcm_register_chain_handler(struct
>> omap_prcm_irq_setup *irq_setup)
>> pr_err("PRCM: already initialized; won't reinitialize\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> -
>
> This change is against the coding style.
>
I will fix this. Thanks for catching this.
>> if (nr_regs > OMAP_PRCM_MAX_NR_PENDING_REG) {
>> pr_err("PRCM: nr_regs too large\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -339,8 +338,8 @@ int omap_prcm_register_chain_handler(struct
>> omap_prcm_irq_setup *irq_setup)
>> ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
>> ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
>>
>> - ct->regs.ack = irq_setup->ack + i * 4;
>> - ct->regs.mask = irq_setup->mask + i * 4;
>> + ct->regs.ack = irq_setup->ack[i];
>> + ct->regs.mask = irq_setup->mask[i];
>
> ... and you can drop this change.
>
>>
>> irq_setup_generic_chip(gc, mask[i], 0, IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0);
>> prcm_irq_chips[i] = gc;
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: Add AM437x specific data
2015-06-22 6:22 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: AM437x: Add IO wake up support Keerthy
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: OMAP: PRM: Remove hardcoding of IRQENABLE_MPU_2 and IRQSTATUS_MPU_2 register offsets Keerthy
@ 2015-06-22 6:22 ` Keerthy
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: PRM: AM437x: Enable IO wakeup feature Keerthy
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2015-06-22 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-omap, tony
Cc: galak, t-kristo, pawel.moll, linux-kernel, paul, bcousson,
linux-clk, j-keerthy
The register offsets for some of the PRM Registers are different
hence populating the differing fields.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
index 20b547a..686bcab 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
@@ -18,13 +18,14 @@
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
-
+#include <linux/of.h>
#include "soc.h"
#include "iomap.h"
#include "common.h"
#include "vp.h"
#include "prm44xx.h"
+#include "prcm43xx.h"
#include "prm-regbits-44xx.h"
#include "prcm44xx.h"
#include "prminst44xx.h"
@@ -723,6 +724,14 @@ int __init omap44xx_prm_init(const struct omap_prcm_init_data *data)
omap4_prminst_set_prm_dev_inst(data->device_inst_offset);
+ /* Add AM437X specific differences */
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(data->np, "ti,am4-prcm")) {
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.nr_irqs = 1;
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.pm_ctrl = AM43XX_PRM_IO_PMCTRL_OFFSET;
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.ack[0] = AM43XX_PRM_IRQSTATUS_MPU_OFFSET;
+ omap4_prcm_irq_setup.mask[0] = AM43XX_PRM_IRQENABLE_MPU_OFFSET;
+ }
+
return prm_register(&omap44xx_prm_ll_data);
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6/6] ARM: PRM: AM437x: Enable IO wakeup feature
2015-06-22 6:22 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: AM437x: Add IO wake up support Keerthy
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: Add AM437x specific data Keerthy
@ 2015-06-22 6:22 ` Keerthy
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2015-06-22 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-omap, tony
Cc: galak, t-kristo, pawel.moll, linux-kernel, paul, bcousson,
linux-clk, j-keerthy
Enable IO wakeup feature.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
index 10ef0da..238cb4a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
@@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static struct omap_prcm_init_data am4_prm_data __initdata = {
.index = TI_CLKM_PRM,
.init = omap44xx_prm_init,
.device_inst_offset = AM43XX_PRM_DEVICE_INST,
+ .flags = PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP,
};
#endif
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread