From: Bin Liu <b-liu-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
Yegor Yefremov
<yegorslists-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: musb: communication issue with more than 12 FTDI ports
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:11:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561E9AC1.2030401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874mhtbc63.fsf-HgARHv6XitJaoMGHk7MhZQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
On 10/14/2015 12:19 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Bin Liu <b-liu-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> On 10/14/2015 12:05 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Bin Liu <b-liu-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>>> Felipe,
>>>>
>>>> On 10/14/2015 11:25 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bin Liu <b-liu-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>>>>> On 10/14/2015 10:56 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bin Liu <b-liu-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/13/2015 01:22 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Yegor Yefremov
>>>>>>>>>> <yegorslists-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> We have a problem, when using more than 12 FTDI ports. Kernels tried:
>>>>>>>>>>> 3.18.1, 4.2.3 and 4.3-rc5. SoC am335x 600MHz
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Below the USB topology:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> # lsusb -t
>>>>>>>>>>> /: Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=musb-hdrc/1p, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> /: Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=musb-hdrc/1p, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=, Driver=hub/4p, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 1: Dev 9, If 0, Class=, Driver=hub/4p, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 1: Dev 10, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 12M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 2: Dev 11, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 2: Dev 11, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 2: Dev 11, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 2: Dev 11, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 3: Dev 12, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 3: Dev 12, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 3: Dev 12, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 3: Dev 12, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 3: Dev 7, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 3: Dev 7, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 3: Dev 7, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>>>> |__ Port 3: Dev 7, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How many EPs does each FTDI device require? at least one INT EP, right?
>>>>>>>> If I read it right, the topology above has 2 hubs, and 16 high-speed
>>>>>>>> FTDI and 1 full-speed FTDI. So it requires at least 18 high-speed INT
>>>>>>>> EPs. MUSB driver only has 11 high-speed EPs for mode-4 which is the EP
>>>>>>>> configuration used by default. I am wondering how those devices got
>>>>>>>> enumerated properly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dynamic EP allocation, but that has its own limitations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> MUSB does not support dynamic EP allocation for INT/ISOCH.
>>>>>
>>>>> I remember isoc doesn't, not sure about int. Do you remember where that
>>>>> part of the code is off the top of your head ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The MUSB EP allocation is in musb_schedule() in musb_host.c.
>>>>
>>>> It does not have specific policy for INT/ISOCH, but the issue is that
>>>> for periodic EP, it got allocated during device enumeration but freed
>>>> only when the device is disconnected. So practically there is no dynamic
>>>> EP allocation for INT/ISOCH.
>>>
>>> This is not exactly what I can see when trying things out:
>>>
>>> minicom.cap:56:[ 90.909917] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df62d240 urb dc4ebec0 dev3 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 10, df700680/1
>>> minicom.cap:66:[ 91.175860] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df62d240 urb dc4ebec0 dev3 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 10, df700680/1
>>> minicom.cap:100:[ 91.697827] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df62d240 urb dc4ebec0 dev3 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 10, df700680/1
>>> minicom.cap:106:[ 91.818066] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh dc4eb340 urb df5b7e40 dev4 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 11, df5c3400/1
>>> minicom.cap:149:[ 92.475792] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df62d240 urb dc4ebec0 dev3 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 10, df700680/1
>>> minicom.cap:162:[ 92.736808] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh dc07d5c0 urb dc4ebec0 dev3 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 10, df700680/1
>>> minicom.cap:207:[ 93.703046] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df551cc0 urb df65ee40 dev7 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 12, df6a2bc0/1
>>> minicom.cap:215:[ 93.977574] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df551cc0 urb df65ee40 dev7 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 12, df6a2bc0/1
>>> minicom.cap:240:[ 94.388472] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh dc4eb340 urb df5b7e40 dev4 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 11, df5c3400/1
>>> minicom.cap:289:[ 95.422325] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh dc4eb340 urb df5b7e40 dev4 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 11, df5c3400/1
>>> minicom.cap:305:[ 95.688207] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh dc4eb340 urb df5b7e40 dev4 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 11, df5c3400/1
>>> minicom.cap:335:[ 96.291453] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df551cc0 urb df65ee40 dev7 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 12, df6a2bc0/1
>>> minicom.cap:410:[ 97.696976] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df6b70c0 urb dc011f40 dev11 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 2, dd842080/8
>>> minicom.cap:56:[ 90.909917] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df62d240 urb dc4ebec0 dev3 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 10, df700680/1
>>> minicom.cap:66:[ 91.175860] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df62d240 urb dc4ebec0 dev3 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 10, df700680/1
>>> minicom.cap:100:[ 91.697827] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df62d240 urb dc4ebec0 dev3 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 10, df700680/1
>>> minicom.cap:106:[ 91.818066] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh dc4eb340 urb df5b7e40 dev4 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 11, df5c3400/1
>>> minicom.cap:149:[ 92.475792] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df62d240 urb dc4ebec0 dev3 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 10, df700680/1
>>> minicom.cap:162:[ 92.736808] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh dc07d5c0 urb dc4ebec0 dev3 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 10, df700680/1
>>> minicom.cap:207:[ 93.703046] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df551cc0 urb df65ee40 dev7 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 12, df6a2bc0/1
>>> minicom.cap:215:[ 93.977574] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df551cc0 urb df65ee40 dev7 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 12, df6a2bc0/1
>>> minicom.cap:240:[ 94.388472] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh dc4eb340 urb df5b7e40 dev4 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 11, df5c3400/1
>>> minicom.cap:289:[ 95.422325] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh dc4eb340 urb df5b7e40 dev4 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 11, df5c3400/1
>>> minicom.cap:305:[ 95.688207] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh dc4eb340 urb df5b7e40 dev4 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 11, df5c3400/1
>>> minicom.cap:335:[ 96.291453] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df551cc0 urb df65ee40 dev7 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 12, df6a2bc0/1
>>> minicom.cap:410:[ 97.696976] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.1.auto: qh df6b70c0 urb dc011f40 dev11 ep1in-intr, hw_ep 2, dd842080/8
>>>
>>> Note how the same ep1in-intr was used with different devices and
>>> different hw_eps. OTOH, within the same device, hw_ep was
>>
>> Maybe I am wrong, but ep1in-intr is the EP reference to the device EP,
>> while hw_ep is the reference to MUSB host EP.
>
> We can't really know which EP the device side is using, right ? :-) The
Right, ep1in-intr is the EP# from the descriptor.
> device sides gives us an address in the EP descriptor, but that's just a
> USB view, we don't know which hw endpoint the device is using; we only
The host does not have to know the hw EP on the device side.
> know its USB address.
The host know the device address and each EP reported from the
descriptors. That is all for communication.
>
>>> constant. Hmmm...
>>
>> My understanding here is that a dedicated MUSB EP is allocated
>> permanently for each device.
>
> Could be, it has been quite a long time since I messed around that part
> of MUSB.
>
Hope you can pick it up, I have a list of issues with MUSB. I did not
send them out just because I know you have other high priority things to
do. ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 9:34 musb: communication issue with more than 12 FTDI ports Yegor Yefremov
[not found] ` <CAGm1_ku3d4q3jQ6ZZYaLktd182O_WY5Hvu-Z877N31e5wN2_NA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-12 10:34 ` Yegor Yefremov
[not found] ` <CAGm1_kvwLu=4R1G8+bXEhmU4298B-+XGKQRaOjZOz15eU1StFw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-12 13:33 ` Konstantin Shkolnyy
2015-10-13 18:22 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <87r3kyd3xw.fsf-HgARHv6XitJaoMGHk7MhZQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-14 15:35 ` Bin Liu
[not found] ` <561E7639.40506-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-14 15:56 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <87h9ltbg0i.fsf-HgARHv6XitJaoMGHk7MhZQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-14 15:57 ` Bin Liu
[not found] ` <561E7B6D.80605-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-14 16:25 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <87eggxbeou.fsf-HgARHv6XitJaoMGHk7MhZQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-14 16:41 ` Bin Liu
[not found] ` <561E85D4.4040208-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-14 17:05 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <87bnc1bcu1.fsf-HgARHv6XitJaoMGHk7MhZQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-14 17:09 ` Bin Liu
[not found] ` <561E8C4E.1020602-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-14 17:19 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <874mhtbc63.fsf-HgARHv6XitJaoMGHk7MhZQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-14 18:11 ` Bin Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561E9AC1.2030401@ti.com \
--to=b-liu-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yegorslists-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).