From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] irqchip: omap-intc: add support for spurious irq handling
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:05:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568A2ED5.9060704@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151215152842.GR23396@atomide.com>
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 08:58 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> [151215 06:26]:
>> Under some conditions, irq sorting procedure used
>> by INTC can go wrong resulting in a spurious irq
>> getting reported.
>>
>> If this condition is not handled, it results in
>> endless stream of:
>>
>> unexpected IRQ trap at vector 00
>>
>> messages from ack_bad_irq()
>>
>> Handle the spurious interrupt condition in omap-intc
>> driver to prevent this.
>>
>> Measurements using kernel function profiler on AM335x
>> EVM running at 720MHz show that after this patch
>> omap_intc_handle_irq() takes about 37.4us against
>> 34us before this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
>
> Looks good to me, probably should get tagged Cc stable when
> committing:
>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Can you please apply this if it looks good?
Thanks,
Sekhar
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-04 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 14:26 [PATCH v3] irqchip: omap-intc: add support for spurious irq handling Sekhar Nori
2015-12-15 15:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-04 8:35 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568A2ED5.9060704@ti.com \
--to=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).