From: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com, sre@debian.org, sre@ring0.de,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org,
aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com,
patrikbachan@gmail.com, serge@hallyn.com, a.hajda@samsung.com
Subject: Re: /sys/class/power_supply/bq27200-0/capacity changed meaning between 4.1 and 4.4?
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:48:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56942344.9070609@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160111214247.GA9735@amd>
On 01/11/2016 03:42 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Did /sys/class/power_supply/bq27200-0/capacity change meaning between
>>> 4.1 and 4.4?
>
>> There was a resent overhaul of this driver and a lot of code is
>> vestigial as you have seen. I've been meaning to continue
>> cleaning it up, my next step would probably to bring up regmap
>
> Ok, 1wire is probably reasonable approach. But we have an regression
> between 4.1 and 4.4, and to debug it is probably by reading code.
>
> I can't prove you caused the regression, but you basically rewrote the
> driver, so it should be easier for you to spot the bug.
>
Makes sense.
> n900 has this variant:
>
> bq27200: bq27200@55 {
> compatible = "ti,bq27200";
> reg = <0x55>;
> };
>
Hmmm, not sure if I have this one on hand, I'll see if I can find an
n900 around here (they seem to be pretty popular around here for testing
(had a lot of TI parts)).
> Will you try?
>
> If not, tell me, and I can do it, but it will involve a lot of swaring...
>
I'll give it a look over.
> Thanks,
> Pavel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-11 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-09 23:07 /sys/class/power_supply/bq27200-0/capacity changed meaning between 4.1 and 4.4? Pavel Machek
2016-01-10 8:06 ` Pavel Machek
2016-01-11 14:44 ` Andrew F. Davis
2016-01-11 14:25 ` Andrew F. Davis
2016-01-11 21:42 ` Pavel Machek
2016-01-11 21:48 ` Andrew F. Davis [this message]
2016-01-12 15:22 ` Andrew F. Davis
2016-01-12 21:53 ` Pavel Machek
2016-01-13 8:44 ` Pali Rohár
2016-01-13 10:26 ` Sebastian Reichel
2016-01-13 10:32 ` Pali Rohár
2016-01-13 11:01 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56942344.9070609@ti.com \
--to=afd@ti.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=patrikbachan@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sre@debian.org \
--cc=sre@ring0.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).