From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: OMAPDSS: panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01: update to use gpiod
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:44:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569751E5.40204@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160113232230.GQ12600@atomide.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2094 bytes --]
Hi Tony,
On 14/01/16 01:22, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> [151223 23:29]:
>> [ It's weird that I'm just now getting this warning from 2014... Oh
>> well, looks legit. -dan ]
>
> Sorry for the delay on this one, got distracted few times with
> other bugs to deal with. This seems like a valid warning yeah.
>
> Tomi, do we really need two copies of the the same panels
> files in kernel?
>
> For example:
>
> $ find . -name panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c
> ./drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c
Strictly no, but I think this is the best way forward. Longer story:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/143151
>> The patch 9522f9fe86f9: "OMAPDSS: panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01: update to
>> use gpiod" from Apr 28, 2014, leads to the following static checker
>> warning:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c:213 sharp_ls_get_gpio()
>> warn: 'gd' isn't an ERR_PTR
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c
>> 200 static int sharp_ls_get_gpio(struct device *dev, int gpio, unsigned long flags,
>> 201 char *desc, struct gpio_desc **gpiod)
>> 202 {
>> 203 struct gpio_desc *gd;
>> 204 int r;
>> 205
>> 206 *gpiod = NULL;
>> 207
>> 208 r = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, gpio, flags, desc);
>> 209 if (r)
>> 210 return r == -ENOENT ? 0 : r;
>> 211
>> 212 gd = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
>> 213 if (IS_ERR(gd))
>> 214 return PTR_ERR(gd) == -ENOENT ? 0 : PTR_ERR(gd);
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> gd can be an ERR_PTR if gpio_to_desc is defined out but it's never
>> -ENOENT.
>
> Seems like we can just remove the check for -ENOENT here.
Yep. Writing a patch for this and the other panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01
error Dan reported is on my todo.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20151224072926.GE29642@mwanda>
2016-01-13 23:22 ` OMAPDSS: panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01: update to use gpiod Tony Lindgren
2016-01-14 7:44 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2016-01-14 16:45 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569751E5.40204@ti.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).