From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Armstrong Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pwm: omap-dmtimer: add dev_dbg() message for effective period and duty cycle Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:49:13 +0100 Message-ID: <56B9E049.5080700@baylibre.com> References: <1454128014-22866-1-git-send-email-drivshin.allworx@gmail.com> <1454128014-22866-5-git-send-email-drivshin.allworx@gmail.com> <20160201132228.2634b72e.drivshin.allworx@gmail.com> <20160201185952.GN19432@atomide.com> <20160202162330.GA4918@ulmo> <20160202184443.1e1b0bf5.drivshin.allworx@gmail.com> <20160203141454.GC9650@ulmo> <20160205145146.34ec4eb9.drivshin.allworx@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160205145146.34ec4eb9.drivshin.allworx@gmail.com> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "David Rivshin (Allworx)" , Thierry Reding Cc: Tony Lindgren , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Grant Erickson , NeilBrown , Joachim Eastwood List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 02/05/2016 08:51 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote: > > Either way, I think any changes along these lines would probably be > cleaner ontop of the atomic update work (assuming some form of that > gets merged). And since it would also be outside the scope of this > patchset, you may still want to consider the simple debug message > in this patch as at least an interim state. > Sure, we should push these patches and rework this one later. Acked-by: Neil Armstrong Thanks, Neil