From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: dra7xx: Fix compatible string for PCF8575 chip Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:59:39 +0200 Message-ID: <570DEE5B.1010001@linutronix.de> References: <1458147150.20441.2.camel@codethink.co.uk> <56E9DED9.6020909@ti.com> <20160412210438.GA5995@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160412210438.GA5995-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Tony Lindgren , Nishanth Menon Cc: Ben Hutchings , linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, CT kernel , Grygorii Strashko , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Roger Quadros List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 04/12/2016 11:04 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> While at it, do you want to fix up (+Seb): >> a) Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-pxa-pci-ce4100.txt which >> also seems to refer to ti,pcf in example (introduced by df2634f43f51 >> x86: dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100 ) >> b) arch/x86/platform/ce4100/falconfalls.dts as well? > > Applying this one with Roger's ack, seems like those should be > additional patches. Okay. I looked it up on the board and it says NXP PCF8575 and not TI. TI's was probably the first hit while I was looking for it (I think CE4100 manual mentioned just PCF8575). But if it would have a TI branding on it I would keep the TI prefix in front and add the NXP prefix. As of today we might not know a functional difference between those two but this does not mean we might find one in the future. That said, are you people sure that the DRA7 has a TI or a NXP branding on it? > > Tony > Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html