From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com (fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 203FF222584; Fri, 23 May 2025 05:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.246 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747978403; cv=none; b=PIkCyXd/d+DHz/9oJlRXKzArZcvnlB5cEm0BsuteYsjuJytJo9Zsea/2t2XypHdl68DXsXmSdkeIhvTF7QPBgZ2hXs6AOTyZ7BpM/9SNBdsUor/yg7x9lcaX0RVGKgeg0nJSiu7diXnheQNX2efAp2pp4hriLVXudJ+fz3e0WXI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747978403; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0B1mE5d6hh55zXmrDVYGoc30+qanDw8Mr9iQY4zYCQA=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VpMI6CDlK/TQmaxgWW4oR31fPIdFtelTe1VHyKusMzgLU7kCnkoNhhtepJOdWdFiTNn7Bju1/sCzfJnfjr8y1Shb3Glo50/YdxjKFd3mJmAPFyfSqiJUjsjLU3a1OkL1scQ8jceZ8gX8aa8VkLT67VEm/GezOEuRJqLmFg7LnhA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=CsKaf0Aw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.246 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="CsKaf0Aw" Received: from fllvem-sh03.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.86]) by fllvem-ot04.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 54N5WfDw833898; Fri, 23 May 2025 00:32:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1747978361; bh=EB7rgMEVkNHPNOu5eE3mPD6AxaPnrpq2uXYFS720rCk=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=CsKaf0AwywPoU+/W5Pthl4dZP8BJPZm5H8gPOpT8k/DUoIXzz2koUH8cYjriuodT0 t4pVdSLU9pAFN0AyZ398wPfeI7g/Gbg//EdA0CuMF2jJt+1GLaVXyH5cTyqmFrbQ5k VLSaDbaqee2M/54LBOndIs+IDf4egJiY2A15wpwE= Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (dlee109.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.41]) by fllvem-sh03.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 54N5Wffd4034342 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 23 May 2025 00:32:41 -0500 Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Fri, 23 May 2025 00:32:40 -0500 Received: from lelvem-mr05.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.9) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 23 May 2025 00:32:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (dhcp-10-24-69-136.dhcp.ti.com [10.24.69.136]) by lelvem-mr05.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 54N5WdIF1038466; Fri, 23 May 2025 00:32:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 11:02:38 +0530 From: Siddharth Vadapalli To: Frank Li CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Revert "ARM: dts: Update pcie ranges for dra7" Message-ID: <5a8a4f18-d5cc-4fd1-aeda-2e739502e0eb@ti.com> References: <20250411153454.3258098-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 03:29:34PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: Hello Frank, > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:34:54AM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > > This reverts commit c761028ef5e27f477fe14d2b134164c584fc21ee. > > > > The commit being reverted updated the "ranges" property for the sake of > > readability. However, this change is no longer appropriate due to the > > following reasons: > > > > - On many SoCs, the PCIe parent bus translates CPU addresses to different > > values before passing them to the PCIe controller. > > - The reverted commit introduced a fake address translation, which violates > > the fundamental DTS principle: the device tree should reflect actual > > hardware behavior. > > > > Reverting this change prepares for the cleanup of the driver's > > cpu_addr_fixup() hook. > > > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li > > --- > > s-vadapalli: > > Any update about this patch? it prepare to remove cpu_addr_fixes()! This patch looks good to me, but I was hoping that Tony Lindgren, who is the author of the commit being reverted, would provide feedback as well. Regards, Siddharth.