From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tero Kristo Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/3] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: assign main clock from DT if available Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 10:07:30 +0300 Message-ID: <5df79d6b-352d-8341-4bd0-fec4e4cc322d@ti.com> References: <1495127772-7486-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1495127772-7486-2-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <20170526154416.GC3717@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170526154416.GC3717@atomide.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 26/05/17 18:44, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tero Kristo [170518 10:19]: >> Fix the main clock assignment to assign clkctrl clk from DT as the main >> clock if available. If main clock is assigned via DT, the direct PRCM >> access for module handling is not used on OMAP4+ architectures either, >> as it is assumed the main clock will be doing this instead. > > Is this still needed based on what we chatted last week? > > I'd like to avoid adding the clkctrl clocks to the wrong node > as we then end up moving them again later on when we have support > for the wrapper device.. > > Regards, > > Tony > I am investigating this currently, don't have much input yet but an alternative solution seems rather plausible. If I can get it working, we don't need this specific patch, but something that will replace it. -Tero