From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david.hagood@gmail.com Subject: Benchmarking: POP flash vs. MMC? Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:24:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <6541c55b1b4ad133498add734c9eecc8.squirrel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.226]:1313 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754638AbZDCVYu (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 17:24:50 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so437388rvb.5 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Deathwish.hagood.sktc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2224BC7B8235 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:24:45 -0500 (CDT) Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Has anybody done any benchmarking on POP flash read/write speeds (using JFFS2) vs. MMC/SDHC card access (using ext[234])? Or for that matter, has anybody done any playing around with using the execute in place function of JFFS2 to see if there is any over-all speed advantage (due to reduced pressure on the RAM) vs. loading into RAM?