From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:40:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <768161.83147.qm@web180312.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <1275916830.1645.566.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1275916830.1645.566.camel@laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Brian Swetland , Peter Zijlstra Cc: tytso@mit.edu, Neil Brown , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Felipe Balbi , Christoph Hellwig , Florian Mickler , James Bottomley , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Linux PM , Alan Cox , Arjan van de Ven List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org --- On Mon, 6/7/10, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > So what's up with this Binder stuff, from what I can see > its just > yet-another-CORBA. Why does it need a kernel part at all, > can't you > simply run with a user-space ORB instead? > > I really don't get why people keep re-inventing CORBA, That made me laugh. Do you realize that one of the earliest objections to CORBA was "why do people keep re-inventing RPC" ... :) (Simple answer: the existing stuff didn't solve enough of the right problems ... and it was easier (in a political sense) to come up with something new than to try fixing DCE or ONC (or whatever). Similar answers may still apply ... last I looked at CORBA, it didn't standardize desktop integration (or cell-phone equivalents), and the pure user-space versions suffered slowdowns when looking up object bindings. > there's some really nice (free) ORBs out there,