linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Program CPU logic power state
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:03:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7h61f98hvw.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413923076-26063-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> (Nishanth Menon's message of "Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:24:36 -0500")

Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:

> CPU logic power state is never programmed in either the initialization
> or the suspend/resume logic, instead, we depend on mpuss to program this
> properly. However, this leaves CPU logic power state indeterminate and
> most probably in reset configuration (If bootloader or other similar
> software have'nt monkeyed with the register). This can make powerstate=
> RET be either programmed for CSWR (logic=ret) or OSWR(logic = OFF) and
> in OSWR, there can be context loss when the code does not expect it.
>
> To prevent all these confusions, just support clearly ON, INA, CSWR,
> OFF which is the intent of the existing code by explicitly programming
> logic state.
>
> NOTE: since this is a hot path (using in cpuidle), the exit path just
> programs powerstate (logic state is immaterial when powerstate is ON).
>
> Without doing this, we end up with lockups when CPUs enter OSWR and
> multiple blocks loose context, when we expect them to hit CSWR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-24 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-21 20:24 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Program CPU logic power state Nishanth Menon
2014-10-24 18:03 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2014-11-11  0:03   ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7h61f98hvw.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
    --to=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).