From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: RE: [PATCH 08/17] omap4: pm: Add GIC save/restore support Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:44:48 +0530 Message-ID: <80e67b305c809bfd218fff06ad27b97a@mail.gmail.com> References: <1298112158-28469-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com><1298112158-28469-9-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com><8739n55f75.fsf@ti.com><20b497dc6e31dd5eb91b2a11002966c2@mail.gmail.com> <87ipvykgq9.fsf@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog108.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.199]:40438 "EHLO na3sys009aog108.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759270Ab1CDQOy (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:54 -0500 Received: by mail-qw0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 9so2000456qwc.26 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:14:49 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: <87ipvykgq9.fsf@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@ti.com] > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 9:42 PM > To: Santosh Shilimkar > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] omap4: pm: Add GIC save/restore support > > Santosh Shilimkar writes: > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@ti.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 4:00 AM > >> To: Santosh Shilimkar > >> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] omap4: pm: Add GIC save/restore > support > >> > >> Santosh Shilimkar writes: > >> > > > > [...] > > > >> > + /* > >> > + * Find out how many interrupts are supported. > >> > + * OMAP4 supports max of 128 SPIs where as GIC can > support > >> > + * up to 1020 interrupt sources. > >> > + */ > >> > + max_spi_reg = __raw_readl(gic_dist_base_addr + > GIC_DIST_CTR) & > >> 0x1f; > >> > + max_spi_irq = max_spi_reg * 32; > >> > >> Based on the spec, this should also be max'd at 1020 so you never > >> write the reserved values after 1020. > >> > > > > That's correct as per generic GIC specs. On OMAP4, the maximum > IRQs > > already fused in "DIST_CTR" bit-fields and fixed. Hence we don't > > need that additional comparison. > > > > OK, clarifiying this in the comment above would avoid confusion for > anyone looking at this code in combination with the spec. > Ok. Will update it