From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: provide means to retrigger parent
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:23:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871ugo7rqv.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121016221502.GY28061@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:15:02 +0100")
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:07:49PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>
>> Attempts to retrigger nested threaded IRQs currently fail because they
>> have no primary handler. In order to support retrigger of nested
>> IRQs, the parent IRQ needs to be retriggered.
>>
>> To fix, when an IRQ needs to be resent, if the interrupt has a parent
>> IRQ and runs in the context of the parent IRQ, then resend the parent.
>>
>> Also, handle_nested_irq() needs to clear the replay flag like the
>> other handlers, otherwise check_irq_resend() will set it and it will
>> never be cleared. Without clearing, it results in the first resend
>> working fine, but check_irq_resend() returning early on subsequent
>> resends because the replay flag is still set.
>>
>> Problem discovered on ARM/OMAP platforms where a nested IRQ that's
>> also a wakeup IRQ happens late in suspend and needed to be retriggered
>> during the resume process.
>>
>> Reported-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> [khilman@ti.com: changelog edits, clear IRQS_REPLAY in handle_nested_irq()]
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> Umm, we also have the converse situation. We have platforms where the
> resend has to be done from the child IRQ, and the parent must not be
> touched. I hope that doesn't break those.
I'm assuming the child IRQs you're concerned with are not threaded,
right? This patch only addresses nested, threaded IRQs, and these don't
have a primary handler to run at all, so cannot do any triggering.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-23 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 22:07 [PATCH] genirq: provide means to retrigger parent Kevin Hilman
2012-10-16 22:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-23 22:23 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-10-23 22:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871ugo7rqv.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox