From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: OMAP34xx Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:03:19 -0800 Message-ID: <871uq53p3c.fsf@ti.com> References: <20120205125904.GB11372@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120205172925.GS20333@atomide.com> <20120205175809.GF17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120205182910.GK1426@atomide.com> <87lioegtk9.fsf@ti.com> <87y5sei1qz.fsf@ti.com> <87k43xfee3.fsf@ti.com> <20120208170653.GA3492@kroah.com> <20120208195327.GA5223@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog101.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.67]:53810 "EHLO na3sys009aog101.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755241Ab2BHXD2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:03:28 -0500 Received: by pbcun15 with SMTP id un15so1451318pbc.33 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:03:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120208195327.GA5223@kroah.com> (Greg KH's message of "Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:53:27 -0800") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas , Tony Lindgren , Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson Hi Greg, Greg KH writes: [...] >> It would look to me like they are queued for 3.4 but Kevin says there >> were intended for 3.3-rc. > > Kevin might have wished they would go into 3.3, but given that the first > round of these patches had to be reverted, I thought it safer to wait > for 3.4. Sorry for the churn on these, but I guess we weren't expecting you to apply the first before it got some testing/acks. Sorry about that. The version you have currently queued is needed for v3.3 as they fix brokenness on v3.3. Any chance they can be applied queued for 3.3? We'll have another set of enhancements on top of those that are targetted for v3.4, but those you have queued currently are defintely fixes. Kevin