From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: miscellaneous powerdomain-related improvements Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:27:11 -0800 Message-ID: <871uqgswy8.fsf@ti.com> References: <20120130093931.11027.31048.stgit@dusk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.205]:37695 "EHLO na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752220Ab2A3V1Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:27:16 -0500 Received: by mail-gy0-f182.google.com with SMTP id g15so2226162ghb.13 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:27:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120130093931.11027.31048.stgit@dusk> (Paul Walmsley's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:43:12 -0700") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rajendra Nayak , Santosh Shilimkar , Tero Kristo Paul Walmsley writes: > This series optimizes some of the powerdomain-related code in > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm*, and fixes a bug or two. These were noticed while > working on the functional powerstate code. > > Rajendra and Santosh, if you have a spare moment, could you please > peek at the OMAP4 LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE part of the second patch? It > makes sense to me in theory, but you both would probably know better > than I :-) > > Kevin, want to take this series (assuming folks are happy with it) ? Yes, I'll take this and add the Ack from Santosh. Thanks for the nice cleanup. Will submit after seeing a Tested-by from someone who can test with CORE retention/off on OMAP4 (hint, hint, Tero :) Kevin