Re: [PATCH] OMAP3630: PM: don't warn the user with a trace in case of PM34XX_ERRATUM

[Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>]

Ricardo Salveti de Araujo <ricardo.salveti@canonical.com> writes:

> In case in user has a OMAP3630 < ES1.2 the kernel should warn the user
> about the ERRATUM, but using printk instead of WARN_ON is already
> enough, as there is nothing else the user can do besides changing the
> board.

I agree, it doesn't need a full backtrace.

Minor comment below...
> Signed-off-by: Ricar
do Salveti de Araujo <ricardo.salveti@canonical.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c      |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> index f7b22a1..abb9be0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ void omap_init_power_states(void)
>  	if (IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM(PM_SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583)) {
>  		omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C7].valid = 0;
>  		cpuidle_params_table[OMAP3_STATE_C7].valid = 0;
> -		WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: core off state C7 disabled due to i583\n",
> +		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: core off state C7 disabled due to i583\n",
>  				__func__);

Please use pr_warn() instead.

>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> index a4aa192..983b543 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> @@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ void omap3_pm_off_mode_enable(int enable)
>  				pwrst->pwrdm == core_pwrdm &&
>  				state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
>  			pwrst->next_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> -			WARN_ONCE(1,
> +			printk(KERN_WARNING
>  				"%s: Core OFF disabled due to errata i583\n",
>  				__func__);

ditto

>  		} else {

Thanks,

Kevin