From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: n800 high idle power consumption Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:00:28 +0300 Message-ID: <873abyejdf.fsf@litku.valot.fi> References: <877i1aejon.fsf@litku.valot.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f163.google.com ([209.85.218.163]:38508 "EHLO mail-bw0-f163.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751679AbZDXFAb (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:00:31 -0400 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so900791bwz.37 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:00:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877i1aejon.fsf@litku.valot.fi> (Kalle Valo's message of "Fri\, 24 Apr 2009 07\:53\:44 +0300") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Kalle Valo writes: > Hello all, Hello again, > I was testing 2.6.30-rc3-omap1 on n800 and noticed that idle power > consumption is very high, ten times compared to a 2.6.29 I tested few > weeks back. I'm guessing that CPU doesn't sleep at all. > > Is this a regression? How should I debug this further? Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that I have included Jarkko's patch "ARM: OMAP: Fix tusb6010 init error and compilation warning" in my builds. Otherwise usb won't work. -- Kalle Valo