From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP4: Boot up crash 2.6.31-rc6
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:00:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878whdma1w.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EAF47CD23C76F840A9E7FCE10091EFAB02BA29BE14@dbde02.ent.ti.com> (Santosh Shilimkar's message of "Fri\, 21 Aug 2009 14\:40\:59 +0530")
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:
> Russell,
>
> On the mainline 2.6.31-rc6, OMAP4 boot is crashing. Also serial code in the linux-next branch isn't merge correctly and needs reworked patches.
>
> Can you please see if they are ok?
After the fix I suggested on patch 2/2, I'm OK with these.
Tony, should I pull these into my fixes queue, or do you want to merge
them directly. We will need them in your for-next branch to resolve
the problems in linux-next.
Kevin
> This patch series addresses the OMAP4430 boot up crash issues on the latest 2.6.31-rc6 kernel release. They are generated against 2.6.31-rc6
> (commit= 6c30c53fd5ae6a99a23ad78e90c428d2c8ffb07f)
> OMAP4 was broken after "[PATCH 00/14] OMAP PM fixes for .31-rc series" series got merged in.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg14527.html
>
> Two issues -
> 1. NULL pointer dereference in omap_serial_init()-
> static struct omap_uart_state omap_uart[OMAP_MAX_NR_PORTS], has three instances populated and for OMAP4 macro OMAP_MAX_NR_PORTS=4. So at the fourth iteration, there is NULL pointer oops.
> This was also related to the merge issue in the linux-next branch.
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/20/192
>
> [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: Fix NULL pointer dereference crash.
>
> 2. Console is not working because the uart platform data is not getting registered to kernel. Registration fails because of clock check failure in omap_serial_init(). As you aware the clock framework is still under review on mailing list. Hence below patch is necessary to fix the same.
>
> [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP4: Bypass the clock check.
>
> Thanks !!
>
> Regards,
> Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-21 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-21 9:10 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP4: Boot up crash 2.6.31-rc6 Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-08-21 16:00 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2009-08-22 7:56 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2009-08-24 14:09 ` Tony Lindgren
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-20 16:24 Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878whdma1w.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox