From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Subject: OMAP submissions for next merge window
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:25:21 -0700
Message-ID: <87ab4gupwu.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pz0-f171.google.com ([209.85.222.171]:59858 "EHLO
	mail-pz0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757528AbZFJOZW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:25:22 -0400
Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so809697pzk.33
        for <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org

Russell,

For this merge window, we submitted multiple changesets for OMAP which
Tony then queued up in his for-next branch.  In some offline
discussions, you suggested for the next window we might try a slightly
different approach.  You expressed a preference for merging each
series directly into your tree after review.  Can you confirm and/or
clarify your preference here?

Thanks,

Kevin