From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: OPP: Fix to ensure check of right oppdef after bad one
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 16:15:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d35kx7qd.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337361979-19052-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> (Nishanth Menon's message of "Fri, 18 May 2012 12:26:19 -0500")
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:
> Commit 9fa2df6b90786301b175e264f5fa9846aba81a65
> (ARM: OMAP2+: OPP: allow OPP enumeration to continue if device is not present)
> makes the logic:
> for (i = 0; i < opp_def_size; i++) {
> <snip>
> if (!oh || !oh->od) {
> <snip>
> continue;
> }
> <snip>
> opp_def++;
> }
>
> In short, the moment we hit a "Bad OPP", we end up looping the list
> comparing against the bad opp definition pointer for the rest of the
> iteration count. Instead, increment opp_def in the for loop itself
> and allow continue to be used in code without much thought so that
> we check the next set of OPP definition pointers :)
>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> Cc: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Good catch.
Queuing for my next set of PM fixes for v3.5-rc (branch: for_3.5/fixes/pm-2)
Thanks for the fix!
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-18 17:26 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: OPP: Fix to ensure check of right oppdef after bad one Nishanth Menon
2012-05-31 23:15 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-06-01 7:03 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-06-01 7:05 ` Menon, Nishanth
2012-06-01 13:54 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d35kx7qd.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=steve@sakoman.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox