From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: runtime PM usage_count during driver_probe_device()?
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:44:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d3hu6oxo.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k4c3dktm.fsf@ti.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:19:01 -0700")
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> writes:
[...]
> If the device bus type's or driver's ->probe() or ->remove()
> callback runs pm_runtime_suspend() or pm_runtime_idle() or their
> asynchronous counterparts, they will fail returning -EAGAIN, because
> the device's usage counter is incremented by the core before
> executing ->probe() and ->remove(). Still, it may be desirable to
> suspend the device as soon as ->probe() or ->remove() has finished,
> so the PM core uses pm_runtime_idle_sync() to invoke the
> subsystem-level idle callback for the device at that time.
[...]
> Another curiosity is that, contrary to the above documentation, there is
> no usage_count increment before the bus/driver ->remove() (although
> there is a _get_sync/_put_sync around the sysfs_remove and notifier just
> before the bus/driver->remove().
OK, so the ->probe() part has been explained and makes sense, but I
would expect ->remove() to be similarily protected (as the documentation
states.) But that is not the case. Is that a bug? If so, patch below
makes the code match the documentation.
Kevin
>From eef73ab2feb203bacb57dc35862f2a9969b61593 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:37:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] driver core: prevent runtime PM races with ->remove()
Runtime PM Documentation states that the runtime PM usage count is
incremented during driver ->probe() and ->remove(). This is designed
to prevent driver runtime PM races with subsystems which may initiate
runtime PM transitions before during and after drivers are loaded.
Current code increments the usage_count during ->probe() but not
during ->remove(). This patch fixes the ->remove() part and makes the
code match the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
---
drivers/base/dd.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index 6658da7..47e079d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -329,13 +329,13 @@ static void __device_release_driver(struct device *dev)
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&dev->bus->p->bus_notifier,
BUS_NOTIFY_UNBIND_DRIVER,
dev);
-
- pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
-
if (dev->bus && dev->bus->remove)
dev->bus->remove(dev);
else if (drv->remove)
drv->remove(dev);
+
+ pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
+
devres_release_all(dev);
dev->driver = NULL;
klist_remove(&dev->p->knode_driver);
--
1.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-01 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-30 22:19 runtime PM usage_count during driver_probe_device()? Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 0:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 0:33 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-01 5:57 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-07-01 14:46 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 11:32 ` Ming Lei
2011-07-01 14:54 ` Alan Stern
2011-07-01 14:43 ` Alan Stern
2011-07-01 14:44 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-07-01 15:25 ` Alan Stern
2011-07-01 15:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 15:59 ` Alan Stern
2011-07-01 16:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 20:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-01 21:12 ` Alan Stern
2011-07-01 21:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-01 22:12 ` [PATCH] PM / Runtime: Update documentation regarding driver removal Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-01 22:49 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 21:42 ` [linux-pm] runtime PM usage_count during driver_probe_device()? Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d3hu6oxo.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox