public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: runtime PM usage_count during driver_probe_device()?
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:44:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d3hu6oxo.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k4c3dktm.fsf@ti.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:19:01 -0700")

Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> writes:

[...]

>     If the device bus type's or driver's ->probe() or ->remove()
>     callback runs pm_runtime_suspend() or pm_runtime_idle() or their
>     asynchronous counterparts, they will fail returning -EAGAIN, because
>     the device's usage counter is incremented by the core before
>     executing ->probe() and ->remove().  Still, it may be desirable to
>     suspend the device as soon as ->probe() or ->remove() has finished,
>     so the PM core uses pm_runtime_idle_sync() to invoke the
>     subsystem-level idle callback for the device at that time.

[...]

> Another curiosity is that, contrary to the above documentation, there is
> no usage_count increment before the bus/driver ->remove() (although
> there is a _get_sync/_put_sync around the sysfs_remove and notifier just
> before the bus/driver->remove().

OK, so the ->probe() part has been explained and makes sense, but I
would expect ->remove() to be similarily protected (as the documentation
states.)  But that is not the case.  Is that a bug?  If so, patch below
makes the code match the documentation.

Kevin

>From eef73ab2feb203bacb57dc35862f2a9969b61593 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:37:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] driver core: prevent runtime PM races with ->remove()

Runtime PM Documentation states that the runtime PM usage count is
incremented during driver ->probe() and ->remove().  This is designed
to prevent driver runtime PM races with subsystems which may initiate
runtime PM transitions before during and after drivers are loaded.

Current code increments the usage_count during ->probe() but not
during ->remove().  This patch fixes the ->remove() part and makes the
code match the documentation.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
---
 drivers/base/dd.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index 6658da7..47e079d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -329,13 +329,13 @@ static void __device_release_driver(struct device *dev)
 			blocking_notifier_call_chain(&dev->bus->p->bus_notifier,
 						     BUS_NOTIFY_UNBIND_DRIVER,
 						     dev);
-
-		pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
-
 		if (dev->bus && dev->bus->remove)
 			dev->bus->remove(dev);
 		else if (drv->remove)
 			drv->remove(dev);
+
+		pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
+
 		devres_release_all(dev);
 		dev->driver = NULL;
 		klist_remove(&dev->p->knode_driver);
-- 
1.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-01 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-30 22:19 runtime PM usage_count during driver_probe_device()? Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01  0:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01  0:33   ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-01  5:57     ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-07-01 14:46       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 11:32     ` Ming Lei
2011-07-01 14:54   ` Alan Stern
2011-07-01 14:43 ` Alan Stern
2011-07-01 14:44 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-07-01 15:25   ` Alan Stern
2011-07-01 15:45     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 15:59       ` Alan Stern
2011-07-01 16:54         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 20:53       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-01 21:12         ` Alan Stern
2011-07-01 21:44           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-01 22:12           ` [PATCH] PM / Runtime: Update documentation regarding driver removal Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-01 22:49             ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-01 21:42 ` [linux-pm] runtime PM usage_count during driver_probe_device()? Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d3hu6oxo.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox