From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] OMAP OPP: remove some unnecessary variables Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:28:09 -0800 Message-ID: <87d42cxkd2.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <20091218004617.7694.84525.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20091218004730.7694.17270.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:53774 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754023AbZLRR2M (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:28:12 -0500 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so2033462pwj.21 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:28:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091218004730.7694.17270.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (Paul Walmsley's message of "Thu\, 17 Dec 2009 17\:47\:32 -0700") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: nm@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Paul Walmsley writes: > No need to allocate new variables; the passed-in OPP list pointers do nicely > as iterators. Thanks Paul for this series. I totally agree with the cleanups you've done. I've rebased this on top of my current pm-wip-opp branch and will include it in the next push of that branch for broader use and testing. Kevin