From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: n800 high idle power consumption Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:50:11 +0300 Message-ID: <87d4b2b1po.fsf@litku.valot.fi> References: <877i1aejon.fsf@litku.valot.fi> <87zle6xj17.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:63151 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753790AbZDXNuT (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:50:19 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so182341fgg.17 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:50:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zle6xj17.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Fri\, 24 Apr 2009 06\:45\:08 -0700") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Kevin Hilman writes: > Kalle Valo writes: > >> Hello all, >> >> I was testing 2.6.30-rc3-omap1 on n800 and noticed that idle power >> consumption is very high, ten times compared to a 2.6.29 I tested few >> weeks back. I'm guessing that CPU doesn't sleep at all. >> >> Is this a regression? How should I debug this further? > > Between .29 and .30, the PM code in l-o was dropped and re-sync'd to > kernel.org code. This is so that PM can be separated out into a > separate branch and submitted upstream independently. Ah, of course. I read about this but didn't understand the implications :) Thanks for pointing this out to me. > The current PM branch is in the process of being re-based onto 2.6.30. > When it's ready, I'd appreciate any testing on n800. Ok. Please let me know when it's ready. -- Kalle Valo