linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: javier Martin <javier.martin@vista-silicon.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Koen Kooi <koen@beagleboard.org>
Subject: Re: cpuidle status in mainline for Beagleboard xM
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:46:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ei00f94i.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKLOr0KpCUXrXM7M9YvE3DGPbGjzT4N678eEPfx_GGE7+40-w@mail.gmail.com> (javier Martin's message of "Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:33:31 +0200")

javier Martin <javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> writes:

> Hi Kevin,
> thanks for your help.
>
>> CPU is staying in C0 probably because UARTs are not being idled, so SoC
>> cannot hit deeper idle states.  Try the following at the command line to
>> to enable UART idle timeouts, so the SoC can attempt idle after the
>> timeout period
>>
>> # UART timeouts: omap-serial (4th UART only on OMAP36xx and OMAP4)
>> echo 5 > /sys/devices/platform/omap/omap_uart.0/sleep_timeout
>> echo 5 > /sys/devices/platform/omap/omap_uart.1/sleep_timeout
>> echo 5 > /sys/devices/platform/omap/omap_uart.2/sleep_timeout
>> echo 5 > /sys/devices/platform/omap/omap_uart.3/sleep_timeout
>>
>> After 5 seconds of inactivity on the UARTs, you should see the SoC
>> hitting deeper C-states.
>
> I've tried that but it still doesn't hit any C-state deeper than 0.
> I'll try the same test using your pm branch you pointed me out and
> post the results.
>

The CPUidle stuff works in mainline (after allowing UARTs to idle).

You only need my pm-wip/cpufreq branch for testing CPUfreq.

Kevin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-01 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-01 14:14 cpuidle status in mainline for Beagleboard xM javier Martin
2011-09-01 15:10 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 15:33   ` javier Martin
2011-09-01 17:46     ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-09-02  6:05       ` Jarkko Nikula
2011-09-02  7:23         ` javier Martin
2011-09-02 17:14           ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-05  8:04             ` javier Martin
2011-09-06 21:04               ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ei00f94i.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=javier.martin@vista-silicon.com \
    --cc=koen@beagleboard.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).