From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: FEATURES - is it good enough Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:35:39 -0800 Message-ID: <87eint3uys.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1258732956-18799-1-git-send-email-vikram.pandita@ti.com> <1258732956-18799-2-git-send-email-vikram.pandita@ti.com> <4B06BF4D.2090201@ti.com> <4B06C0F0.7070007@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-px0-f204.google.com ([209.85.216.204]:65351 "EHLO mail-px0-f204.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755121AbZKTSff (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:35:35 -0500 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so1947479pxi.5 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:35:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Santosh Shilimkar's message of "Fri\, 20 Nov 2009 22\:36\:54 +0530") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" Cc: "Menon, Nishanth" , "Aguirre, Sergio" , "Pandita, Vikram" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" "Shilimkar, Santosh" writes: [...] >> > >> > Probably not something ot be attached in this patch, but... >> > >> > I'm a bit curious about something: >> > >> > Why touching omap3_features in OMAP4? >> > >> > Isn't there a omap4_features? >> > >> > Or even better, an omap_features? > > This "is_feature" suppose to take care of Errata's also, is it? "It's not a bug it's a feature." :) > This is errata more than a feature..... We better differentiate in > this regard I agree, I have a hard time calling this empty fifo read fault a "feature." We need a similar thing for errata. Kevin