public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "Varadarajan, Charulatha" <charu@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] OMAP: GPIO: cleanup show revision, remove cpu_is checks, display only once
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:59:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hb9bwd1s.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874o5bg2n8.fsf@ti.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Tue, 03 May 2011 09:38:51 -0700")

Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> writes:

> "Varadarajan, Charulatha" <charu@ti.com> writes:
>
>> Kevin,
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:32, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
>>> Remove cpu_is_* checks from gpio_show_revision() by passing in the
>>> revision address offset from platform data.  SoCs with no revision
>>> register (15xx, 7xx, and all MPUIOs) use -1 to signify no register.
>>>
>>> While here, all GPIO banks are assumed to be the same revision, so fix
>>> show_revision() to only show the revision for the first bank it finds.
>>> This removes duplicate GPIO revision prints during boot.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c         |    2 ++
>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c         |    2 ++
>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c          |    2 ++
>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c             |    2 ++
>>>  arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c              |   14 ++++++--------
>>>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h |    1 +
>>>  6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c
>>> index 9175624..6f77c36 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c
>>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static struct __initdata resource omap15xx_mpu_gpio_resources[] = {
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  static struct omap_gpio_reg_offs omap15xx_mpuio_regs = {
>>> +       .revision       = -1,
>>
>> Assigning -1 to u16 type. Instead you may want to use 0xffff?
>>
>
> The compiler will do the right thing, so personally, I prefer using -1.
> It's safer if/when the type is changed, but the mask not updated.

Actually, you're right here.

While the compiler does the "right thing" for the assignment, it was not
doing the right thing for the comparision in the driver for the revision
check, and thus trying to read from offset 0xffff on OMAP1 for MPUIO
banks (that's probably the reason for a boot hang for you on 17xx.)
At least for me, with this change it's booting on OMAP1 (omap5912/OSK
for me.)

I'll change the usage of -1 here to USHRT_MAX.

Thanks,

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2011-05-03 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-22 23:01 [PATCH 00/15] OMAP: GPIO: clean up: pass register offsets via pdata Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:01 ` [PATCH 01/15] OMAP: GPIO: _clear_gpio_irqbank: fix flushing of posted write Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:01 ` [PATCH 02/15] OMAP: GPIO: remove MPUIO handling from _clear_gpio_irqbank() Kevin Hilman
2011-04-25 13:48   ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-03 16:27     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:01 ` [PATCH 03/15] OMAP: GPIO: move bank width into struct gpio_bank Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:01 ` [PATCH 04/15] OMAP: GPIO: _get_gpio_irqbank_mask: replace hard-coded mask with bank->width Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:01 ` [PATCH 05/15] OMAP: GPIO: replace get_gpio_index() by using bank width Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:01 ` [PATCH 06/15] OMAP: GPIO: remove get_gpio_bank() Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:01 ` [PATCH 07/15] OMAP: GPIO: move register offset defines into gpio.h Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 08/15] OMAP: GPIO: consolidate direction, input, output, remove #ifdefs Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 09/15] OMAP: GPIO: consolidate IRQ status handling, " Kevin Hilman
2011-04-26 12:43   ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-04-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 10/15] OMAP: GPIO: conslidate enable/disable of GPIO IRQs, remove ifdefs Kevin Hilman
2011-04-26 12:33   ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-04-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 11/15] OMAP: GPIO: convert MPUIO IRQ over to generic irq_chip Kevin Hilman
2011-04-26 12:02   ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-04-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 12/15] OMAP: GPIO: remove useless gpio_valid() & check_gpio() checks Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 13/15] OMAP: GPIO: cleanup _set_gpio_wakeup(), remove ifdefs Kevin Hilman
2011-04-26 14:44   ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-03 16:35     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 14/15] OMAP: GPIO: debounce remove SoC specific registers, use pdata Kevin Hilman
2011-04-22 23:02 ` [PATCH 15/15] OMAP: GPIO: cleanup show revision, remove cpu_is checks, display only once Kevin Hilman
2011-04-26 11:48   ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-05-03 16:38     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-03 23:59       ` Kevin Hilman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87hb9bwd1s.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=charu@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox